Voters in every federal seat in Australia support increased action on climate change and the adoption of renewable technology over the government’s plan for a gas-led recovery, according to the largest poll ever conducted on climate change and politics in the country.
The survey of 15,000 Australians conducted by YouGov on behalf of the Australian Conservation Foundation found 67 per cent of voters believed the government should be doing more to address climate change, including a majority in all 151 national seats.
It found support for increased climate action was similar across states and territories, with the highest being the Northern Territory where 71 per cent supported more action and the lowest being NSW, where 65 per cent wanted more. In Victoria 69 per cent wanted more or much more action.
The results, which were matched against census data by YouGov for a so-called regression analysis, also found there is similar support for climate action among rural and city voters.
It found that regional voters were almost as concerned about climate as those in the city. In NSW 66 per cent of metropolitan voters wanted more action compared with 63 per cent in the regions. In Victoria 42 per cent of metropolitan voters wanted to reach net zero before 2050 compared with 41 per cent in the regions.
 |
| Australia’s approach to climate change is coming under increasing pressure. Credit: Getty |
In Cook, 25 per cent of voters said climate change would be the most important issue at the next election and another 41 per cent rated it as among their three most important, with 34 per cent rating it as having low or no importance.
In Deputy Prime Minister Barnaby Joyce’s seat of New England, up to 55 per cent of voters wants more action and the same proportion do not believe coal and gas-fired power stations should be part of Australia’s future energy supply.
As the government prepares for the COP26 United Nations climate talks in Glasgow in November, the survey showed 41 per cent of voters wanted the government to reach net zero before 2050 and 32 per cent believed net zero should be reached by 2050. By contrast, 12 per cent believe 2050 is too fast and 15 per cent believe no goal should be set.
Almost 70 per cent of Victorian voters want the federal government to do more on climate, while in regional areas of the state this figure is slightly lower at 65 per cent.
Not surprisingly, the numbers are lower for Coalition voters: in Greater Melbourne just over half want more to be done, while in regional Victoria it’s 47 per cent.
A third of Labor voters in metropolitan Melbourne said climate change was their number one issue. For Coalition voters this number was about 24 per cent.
In the two most marginal Victorian Coalition-held electorates – Chisholm and Higgins – climate action plans are the number one priority for about one in three voters (29 per cent and 37 per cent).
In Labor’s most marginal Victorian seat of Dunkley, a quarter of all voters (26 per cent) say plans for action on climate change are their priority in the next federal election.
Monash academic and political commentator Zareh Ghazarian said the polling showed there was obvious concern about climate change, but it was impossible to say how this would translate into voting behaviour.
“It’s interesting data because you can see climate change is important to a lot of people,” Dr Ghazarian said.
“I suspect it would be at the top of the political agenda if we weren’t in a pandemic, and there is an appetite in the community for governments to be putting clearer ideas forward.“
“I suspect [climate change] would be at the top of the political agenda if we weren’t in a pandemic.”“But in the last election voters didn’t seem to embrace an opposition that was proposing a range of reforms in this area. There is a sense they wanted to keep policy ideas steady.”
Dr Zareh Ghazarian
Climate change is the number one federal election issue for 29 per cent of NSW voters and one of
the top three issues for 67 per cent.
It is the most important issue for 31 per cent of Coalition voters in metropolitan areas and for one in five in regional electorates.
In the Coalition’s most marginal NSW seat, Reid, 71 per cent of voters wants the federal government to do more, while in Labor’s most marginal federal seat, Macquarie, 67 per cent want more federal action.
Road To Glasgow
Mr Morrison has said the government intended to get to net zero as soon as possible and preferably by 2050, though critics are calling for a firm target.
The Australian government has a target for reducing emissions by between 26 and 28 per cent by 2030, compared with the United Kingdom’s target of 78 per cent by 2035 and the United States’ goal of 50-52 per cent by 2035.
The government is expected to come under international pressure during the COP26 talks to increase its 2030 goals, though some of its MPs, particularly in the Nationals, are concerned about the economic and political cost of increased action.
ACF chief executive Kelly O’Shanassy said the group commissioned the polling because it believes time is running out to stop run away climate warming, and it expects key decisions to be made on Australia’s efforts in the lead up to COP26 and the next election.
“We also wanted to get polling down to an electorate level if we could possibly do it because that was a good way of measuring the diversity of views in Australia, but it’s also a good piece of information for MPs to see whether they are doing what their constituents want done.”
She said she was not surprised by the overwhelming support for renewable energy the survey found, but was that those views were shared in so-called coal seats.
“Even the electorates that have coal and gas communities in them are rejecting the idea of coal and gas being a big part of our energy future going forward,” she said.
The poll found that in the Queensland regional electorates of Flynn, Capricornia, Maranoa and Dawson support for new coal and gas-fired power projects is 40 per cent or less.
One LNP adviser who asked not to be named said that if the poll was correct and held true until the election it suggested that climate could present a political problem in some seats in the next election.
He noted, for example, that the research suggested that in battleground seats like Gilmore, Eden Monaro and Macquarie concern about climate was high. Because all these seats had been hit hard by Black Summer bushfires he expected that concern to be maintained until the election.
But he warned that in other seats voter concerns may shift from climate as the campaign began.
Climate policy  |
| ‘We don’t want to be collateral damage’: Coal country concerns grow as climate reality hits |
He said the government’s mantra of “technology not taxes” was based on an astute understanding that Australians want to see climate action but did not want some communities unfairly penalised to achieve it.
He said that if the poll asked had asked voters how much they were willing to spend on climate action, or what their communities should sacrifice to act on climate, its results would have been significantly different.
Cristina Talacko, chairwoman of Coalition a pro-climate action group aligned with the Liberal and National parties said the finding about the level of concern about climate change among rural and regional voters was significant.
She said the perceived divide on climate change between rural and urban voters had been used as an argument against taking stronger action was disproved by the poll.
“This has been the major problem [for those in the parties wanting more action]. It has always been the argument that a lot of Nationals utilise,” she said.
“The cities and regions more or less have the support level to support renewables, and they support the transition, they support a target,” she said.
“That’s strategically that’s what [Nationals MPs] have to look at.”
How the survey was carried out
YouGov surveyed 15,000 people across all 151 Australian seats and then conducted what is known as multilevel regression with post-stratification on the sample using Australian Bureau of Statistics data. The process is based on the principle that people with similar characteristics tend to share common attitudes and attributes. The outcome of such an analysis is a prediction with a range. The numbers presented in the ACF report are mean estimates, which are typically very close to the middle of that range. |
Links
- ‘Everybody’s scared’: The first mention in Australian media of global warming could only gesture to the future
- Poll suggests the debate over coal is ‘electorally dead’
- Australia’s biggest climate poll shows support for action in every seat
- (AU The Guardian) Guardian Essential Poll: Majority Of Voters Fear Australia Will Be Left Behind On Climate Change
- (AU The Guardian) Seven In 10 Australians Want Government To Take More Action On Climate, Survey Finds
- (AU) If 80% Of Australians Care About Climate Action, Why Don’t They Vote Like It?
- (AU) Wealthy Victorians Least Likely To Support Climate Action: Poll
- (AU) Survey Shows Australian Support For Paris Agreement And Net Zero Target
- (AU) Climate Change Worrying More Australians Than Ever Before, Australia Institute Report Reveals
- Many Globally Are As Concerned About Climate Change As About The Spread Of Infectious Diseases
- (AU) Changing The Narrative Of Climate Change
- 5000 free fast electric car chargers to be built around Australia
- Development of ‘zombie’ gasfield areas would create waste, water issues: opponents
No comments :
Post a Comment