Many Australian boards are struggling to prepare their companies or organisations for climate change, with almost half the country’s directors saying they don’t know how to tackle the issue.
A first-of-its-kind study by the Australian Institute of Company Directors into how boards are approaching climate change reveals that 77 per cent of directors are concerned about how it will affect their organisation, but often failed to act.
 |
| Almost half of the directors surveyed said their boards should pay more attention to climate but did not know how to do so. Credit:Getty |
The
AICD report is based on surveys of 2000 directors at ASX listed
companies, smaller businesses, government organisations and not for
profits.
Almost half of the directors surveyed said their boards should
pay more attention to climate but did not know how to do so, while 28
per cent did not think their board had the knowledge or experience to
adequately address climate governance issues.
Mr Armour said directors should be working to understand their organisation’s impact on climate, and how climate change will impact them.
Executive pay
 |
“As our regulatory tools around climate change and our reporting tools around climate change continue to develop, there will be a bedrock requirement for firms to address that.”
Even smaller businesses would soon need to address demands from consumers, larger supply chain customers and their staff for transparency around their environmental footprint.
“There’ll be some protections for a while but transparency around reporting is just going to continue to increase,” Mr Armour said.
Across all directors, only 11 per cent disagreed that their board needed to do more to respond to climate change, but that rose to 22 per cent in the mining sector.
“It’s not that people ignore the issue, it’s that they don’t know where to start."One in four directors in the mining sector were “not at all concerned” about climate risk to their company, which compared to one in five across all industries and only 8 per cent in the agriculture, forestry and fishing sector.
AICD managing director Angus Armour
Mr Armour said many mining companies already dedicated significant resources to the issue which could explain why their boards were less likely to think more work was required, but the data collected was inconclusive.
Directors of ASX-listed companies were less likely to be “extremely” or “somewhat” concerned about how climate change risks (48 per cent) compared to directors on government or public sector boards (70 per cent). Around half also saw opportunities for their organisation by proactively responding to climate change.
Environmental protection |
Directors said the biggest obstacle to acting was the absence of a settled national climate change policy (46 per cent, the most common response) while 38 per cent said their board did not have the time or resources to deal with it.
Less than half of directors (46 per cent) said their board had embedded climate change in their risk management framework, which the report says, “suggests that risk may not be adequately monitored at board level.“
Links
- Climate Governance Study: Risk and opportunity insights from Australian directors
- Climate crisis requires boards to put climate transition at the heart of corporate strategy, says international network of board directors
- Can lawsuits, boardroom takeovers and protests save the planet?
- Just 100 companies responsible for 71% of global emissions, study says
- The Adani List: Companies that could make or break the Carmichael Coal Project
- The climate clock: What’s the world’s carbon budget and what’s Australia’s share?
- Business Council calls for 46-50% emissions reduction by 2030 on path to net zero
No comments :
Post a Comment