UN’s New Global Environment Outlook Issues Stark Warning and Signals a Crucial Moment for Australia - Lethal Heating Editor BDA

Key Points

World on path to exceed 1.5 °C warming in early 2030s under business-as-usual, risking biodiversity, land and health — and costly climate impacts. 1 Pollution, land degradation and resource-overuse now match climate change as core threats, with wide harms for human health. 2 Transforming energy, food, waste and economic systems could yield US$ 20 trillion per year by 2070—and avoid millions of deaths and poverty. 3 Australia’s ecosystems — including the Great Barrier Reef and bushfire-prone landscapes — remain vulnerable to climate change, overheating oceans and biodiversity loss. 4 The report calls for “whole-of-society” action, urging governments to integrate environmental, economic and social policies. 5 Time is running out: delayed action will escalate costs — both ecological and economic — and foreclose many restoration opportunities. 6

The new edition of the United Nations Environment Programme’s flagship environmental assessment has landed with a collective gasp. 

The seventh Global Environment Outlook 7 (GEO-7), released in December 2025, draws together the work of 287 scientists from 82 countries to deliver a sweeping verdict:

Without immediate, global systemic transformation, the planet is hurtling towards cascading environmental collapse.

Yet GEO-7 also offers something rare in environmental science: a roadmap towards a different future, one where healthier ecosystems, more stable climate and human well-being can go hand in hand.

For Australia, a country already suffering the consequences of extreme heat, coral bleaching and land degradation, the report is more than a wake-up call, it is a moment to re-think national environmental policy and long-term resilience.

Here is what GEO-7 finds, what it means for Australia, and why the next few years may be decisive for both.

Global Diagnosis: Interlinked Crises

GEO-7 emphasizes a central truth: what might once have been seen as separate problems — climate change, biodiversity loss, pollution, land degradation and resource overuse — are deeply entangled.

The report warns that if the world continues on its current trajectory, global average temperatures are likely to exceed 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels in the early 2030s, breach 2 °C in the 2040s, and continue climbing thereafter.

That warming will exacerbate other threats. Land degradation, already affecting a large share of Earth’s terrestrial systems, is projected to intensify, undermining soil health, reducing agricultural productivity and accelerating biodiversity loss.

Pollution,  especially air pollution from fossil fuel combustion, industrial processes and waste mis-management, remains a major health risk. The report suggests that reducing pollution through systemic change could prevent millions of premature deaths.

Resource use has surged beyond sustainable levels. Since 1970, global resource extraction and processing have ballooned, driving over 60 per cent of global greenhouse-gas emissions and 40 per cent of pollution-related health impacts.

In sum, GEO-7 describes a “triple planetary crisis” that can no longer be tackled in isolated silos: the planet’s climate, nature and human health are intimately connected.

Pathways to a Better Future — And High Stakes for Delay

Yet GEO-7 does not resign itself to catastrophe. Rather, it argues that a timely shift in economic, energy, food, waste and finance systems could yield massive long-term benefits.

The report estimates that if societies adopt its “transformation pathways”, global macroeconomic benefits could start to appear around 2050, rising to about US$ 20 trillion annually by 2070, and continuing to grow thereafter.

Meanwhile, public health gains are striking. By 2050, tens of millions of premature deaths from pollution could be avoided, hundreds of millions of people could escape hunger or extreme poverty, and biodiversity decline could notably slow.

The changes required are sweeping: governments must phase out harmful subsidies, price the environmental cost of pollution and resource use, invest in clean energy and sustainable agriculture, overhaul waste and materials management, and embrace what GEO-7 calls “whole-of-government” and “whole-of-society” strategies.

Why GEO-7 Matters for Australia

Australia is not just a distant observer of global environmental change. As a continent-scale nation with fragile ecosystems, a high dependence on resource extraction, and a long history of climate extremes, the country sits at the front-lines of many of GEO-7’s warnings.

Take the Murray–Darling Basin, a vast inland river and farmland system that underpins much of Australia’s agriculture. Climate-driven shifts in rainfall, combined with land use pressures, make the Basin especially vulnerable to degradation, water stress, and collapse of biodiversity and agricultural productivity. 

While GEO-7 deals in global terms, the same dynamics it describes globally apply in the Basin — rising temperatures, shifting rainfall patterns, over-extraction of water, and ecosystem stress.

The report’s alarm about climate change resonating with biodiversity loss and pollution rings especially true for the Great Barrier Reef. Rising sea surface temperatures in 2024, reportedly the highest on record, triggered yet another major bleaching event, as documented by the national environmental assessment published earlier this year.

Beyond marine ecosystems, terrestrial landscapes in many parts of Australia face increased bushfire risk, prolonged droughts and heat stress,  a potent cocktail for land degradation, biodiversity loss and human vulnerability. GEO-7 underscores that such compound risks will intensify unless emissions, land-use and resource pressures are curbed.

On the flip side, GEO-7’s emphasis on transforming energy systems dovetails with Australia’s growing shift towards renewables. The rapid uptake of solar and wind power, and national ambitions to decarbonise, mean GEO-7’s warning that fossil-fuel dependence continues to undermine environmental and economic security should hit close to home for policymakers and citizens alike.

Voices from the Field: What Experts Are Saying

At the release in Nairobi on 9 December 2025, the Executive Director of UNEP described GEO-7 as a “clear choice for humanity”.

Many scientists, including several based in Australia, have echoed the urgency. A professor at the University of the Sunshine Coast, who contributed to the report, has urged the Australian government and society to act on the findings “to avoid an unsustainable future”.

One of the key messages that has reverberated globally, and in Australia, is the need to move beyond narrow measures of economic success, such as gross domestic product. GEO-7 recommends instead accounting for environmental and social costs and benefits, a shift that would make clear the long-term economic and human value of healthy ecosystems, clean air and stable climate.

Some environmental economists say such reframing remains politically difficult but vital. As one proclaimed in the report’s global summary: “There is no technical reason why a sustainable future cannot be built.” The challenge lies in political will, institutional coordination and social mobilisation.

What Australia Could Do — And What’s at Stake

For Australia, GEO-7 provides both a warning and a strategic compass. The government could use the report as a basis to deepen renewable energy investment, accelerate the phase-out of fossil fuels, protect and restore fragile ecosystems, and reform agricultural and land-use laws to reduce over-extraction of resources and prevent land degradation.

In practice, that might involve stronger protections for biodiversity, expanded funding for reef and ecosystem restoration, revisiting water rights and extraction rules in agricultural zones, and embedding environmental externalities into economic decisions.

Implementing a “whole-of-society” approach, as GEO-7 suggests, would also require new levels of coordination across federal, state and local government — and engagement with industry, Indigenous communities, landowners and citizens.

The stakes are high. If Australia ignores the warnings, the costs — in ecological damage, lost economic potential, public health harms and social dislocation — could escalate rapidly. If it acts now, the country could contribute to a global transition that promises both environmental security and long-term prosperity.

Looking Ahead: A Crossroads for the Planet — and Australia

GEO-7 makes clear that the world stands at a crossroads. One path leads to worsening climate breakdown, accelerating biodiversity collapse, widespread land degradation and mounting pollution, with heavy consequences for human health, economic stability and social cohesion. The other offers a chance to un-couple development from environmental harm, building a resilient, healthier world rooted in sustainable practices and systemic transformation.

For Australia, the coming decade may determine whether the damage to iconic ecosystems such as the Great Barrier Reef becomes irreversible or whether restoration and adaptation can offer a future worth inheriting. The choices made now matter.

GEO-7 delivers a simple yet powerful message: the window for effective action is narrowing. Delay is not just dangerous, it may close off many of the options that remain.

References

1. Global Environment Outlook (GEO-7) | Global Environment Outlook (GEO). United Nations Environment Programme. 2025.
2. UNEP: Rich countries use six times more resources, generate 10 times the climate impacts than low-income ones, far exceeding human needs and nature’s capacity. United Nations. 2025.
3. UN Report: Investing in planetary health would deliver higher GDP, fewer deaths, less poverty. United Nations Environment Programme. 09 December 2025.
4. Australia’s environment shows signs of improvement, but our ecosystems remain under threat. Australian National University. 20 March 2025.
5. Overview | Global Environment Outlook (GEO). United Nations Environment Programme. 2025.
6. A sustainable future requires new thinking: UN environment report. UN Geneva press release, 09 December 2025.

Back to Top