12/08/2016

Stopping Land Clearing And Replanting Trees Could Help Keep Australia Cool In A Warmer Future

The Conversation -  |  | 

Increasing land clearing could leave Australia hotter and drier. Wilderness Society
Land clearing is on the rise in Queensland and New South Wales, with land clearing laws being fiercely debated.
In Queensland in 2013–14, 278,000 hectares of native vegetation were cleared (1.2 times the size of the Australian Capital Territory). A further 296,000ha were cleared in 2014–15. These are the highest rates of deforestation in the developed world.
Land clearing on this scale is bad for a whole host of reasons. But our research shows that it is also likely to make parts of Australia warmer and drier, adding to the effects of climate change.

How do trees change the climate?
Land clearing releases greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, but the effect of land clearing on climate goes well beyond carbon emissions. It causes warming locally, regionally and even globally, and it changes rainfall by altering the circulation of heat and moisture.
Trees evaporate more water than any other vegetation type – up to 10 times more than crops and pastures. This is because trees have root systems that can access moisture deep within the soil. Crops and pastures have 70% of their roots in the top 30cm of the soil, while trees and other woody plants have 43% of their roots in the deeper part of the soil.
The increased evaporation and rough surface of trees creates moist, turbulent layers in the lower atmosphere. This reduces temperatures and contributes to cloud formation and increased rainfall. The increased rainfall then provides more moisture to soils and vegetation.
The clearing of deep-rooted native vegetation for shallow-rooted crops and pastures diminishes this process, resulting in a warmer and drier climate.
We can see this process at work along the "bunny fence" in southwest Western Australia, where there is a moister atmosphere and more clouds over native vegetation compared with nearby farming areas during summer.
Studies in Amazonia also indicate that as deforestation expands rainfall declines. A tipping point may be reached when deforestation reaches 30-50%, after which rainfall is substantially reduced. Complete deforestation results in the greatest decline in rainfall.

More trees, cooler moister climate
We wanted to know how land clearing could affect Australia's climate in the future. We did this by modelling two scenarios for different amounts of land clearing, using models developed by CSIRO.
In the first scenario, crops and pasture expand in the semi-arid regions of eastern and southwest Australia. The second scenario limits crops and pastures to highly productive lands, and partially restores less productive lands to savanna woodlands.
We found that restoring trees to parts of Australia would reduce surface temperatures by up to 1.6℃, especially in western Queensland and NSW.
We also found that more trees reduced the overall climate-induced warming from 4.1℃ to 3.2℃ between 2050 and 2100.
Replanting trees could increase summer rainfall by 10% overall and by up to 15.2% in the southwest. We found soil moisture would increase by around 20% in replanted regions.
Our study doesn't mean replanting all farmed land with trees, just areas that are less productive and less cost-effective to farm intensively. In our scenario, the areas that are restored in western Queensland and NSW would need a tree density of around 40%, which would allow a grassy understorey to be maintained. This would allow some production to continue such as cattle grazing at lower numbers or carbon farming.

Political and social challenges
Limiting land clearing represents a major challenge for Australia's policymakers and farming communities.
The growing pressure to clear reflects a narrow economic focus on achieving short- to medium-term returns by expanding agriculture to meet the growing global demand for food and fibre.
However, temperatures are already increasing and rainfall is decreasing over large areas of eastern and southwest Australia. Tree clearing coupled with climate change will make growing crops and raising livestock even harder.
Balancing farming with managing climate change would give land owners on marginal land new options for income generation, while the most efficient agricultural land would remain in production. This would need a combination of regulation and long-term financial incentives.
The climate benefits of limiting land clearing must play a bigger part in land management as Australia's climate becomes hotter and drier. Remnant vegetation needs to be conserved and extensive areas of regrowth must be allowed to regenerate. And where regeneration is not possible, we'll have to plant large numbers of trees.

Links

Roads Could Generate Solar-Powered Electricity Under Proposal

Fairfax - Peter Hannam

Solar panels with skid resistance: energy-producing tiles that can be laid on roads. Photo: Colas
The nation's gridlocked roads might not seem the obvious place to build mini-power plants but the France-based Colas group has different ideas.
According to the global supplier of bitumen and other surface materials, the world's millions of kilometres of roads are empty for as much as 90 per cent of each day, providing a big opportunity to generate solar-powered electricity.

For the past decade, the company has been working with the French National Solar Energy Institute to develop solar panels that are sufficiently resilient and efficient in gathering those rays to warrant the cost of paving roads with them.
The result of those efforts is a solar tile – thinner than a dollar coin and measuring 1.26 square metres – that can provide as much as 116 watts at peak efficiency. 'Wattway' solar road: Built using photovoltaic cells, a promotional video by the company Colas shows the workings of their 'Wattway' solar road.

The developers are aiming to roll out 1000 kilometres of solar roads within five years and are scouting for 100 test sites around the world.
Adelaide and parts of Queensland have indicated an interest in participating and western Sydney could be next, said Azeem Retmullah, Sydney-based general manager for Colas subsidiary SAMI Bitumen Technologies.
Just 20 square metres of the product laid on existing roads can supply enough electricity for a typical home, and 1 km could support about 5000 people, Mr Retmullah said.
The technical challenges are among the reasons why development efforts have taken a decade.
"The fragile photovoltaic cells that you have in the panels are actually encapsulated in polymers and resins, so they are well protected," Mr Retmullah said.
The tiles must withstand heavy vehicles, and many of them. According to Colas, the product it has dubbed Wattway has been tested to withstand at least 1 million truck tyre passes.
It expects the tiles to have the durability of the pavement it covers. Panels laid in car parks or other lightly used tarmac sites could be expected to last as long as 20 years – not far shy of a rooftop system – while those of heavy-trafficked roads might last only as half as long, Colas claims.
Home driveways are another option.
Mr Retmullah said resins used to protect the panels are "reasonably translucent" even when topped with crushed glass or other materials to give them "skid resistance" comparable to standard bitumen roads.
The company estimates panel efficiency is about 15 per cent, not that far off the 18-19 per cent for conventional solar panels.
Just as roads generally "self-clean" as rain washes off dirt and oil, the panels would be kept relatively clear of sun-blocking materials, he said. They may even reduce potholes.
Costs, of course, may prove the biggest road block to their rollout.
Colas doesn't provide a production price per tile, saying only that the target is to deliver €6 ($8.70) per watt peak capacity. If the technology followed the curve of solar PV panels, dropping by 90 per cent over 20 years, "Wattway should become a competitive solution within a decade".
Richard Corkish, chief operating officer at the Australian Centre for Advanced Photovoltaics based at the University of NSW, is sceptical.
Solar roads "are an idea that's been around for some time," Dr Corkish said. "I worry about the amount of stuff you need to get into [each panel] to make it tough enough to take a B-double."
City roads might also be shaded by trees or buildings for much of the day and while rural roads might have a clearer run at the sun, the market for the electricity will be smaller.
"People can get excited by things that are long shots. We're not picking the low-hanging fruit," he said, noting how many large commercial sites are yet to adopt solar PV.
Michael Caltabiano, chief executive of the Australian Asphalt Pavement Association, said western Sydney was an ideal location to test the product, given its proximity to industry and a huge market.
Mr Caltabiano, a former director-general of the Queensland department of Transport and Main Roads, expects few planning issues for the tiles.
"To put solar panels on a road is not a regulatory problem," he said. "It's the willingness of governments to give it a go."

Links

Climate Change May Be Doubted by Some, But Now It’s the Law

Bloomberg

A polar bear stands at the edge of the pack ice north of Svalbard, Norway, on July 20, 2105.
Photographer: Wolfgang Kaehler/LightRocket via Getty Images
A federal appeals court in Chicago gave a thumbs-up this week to an obscure regulatory practice that helps the U.S. government account for projected costs of climate change.
The decision comes less than a week after the White House issued guidance to all federal agencies about how they can build carbon accounting into their decision-making.

Although not as splashy as the economywide "cap" on climate pollution President Obama proposed in his first term, the intensely wonky "social cost of carbon" is gradually making its mark.
The seismic effect of bureaucrats at every level of government adding a new line to their balance sheets cannot be overstated.
The three-judge panel held that the U.S. Department of Energy acted in a reasonable and fair manner when, in 2014, it issued two rules promoting energy efficiency in commercial refrigerators. Multiple lawsuits against the agency were consolidated into one case, which eventually landed in the U.S. Court of Appeals in Chicago.
Unsurprisingly, the decision doesn't read like a potboiler. U.S. Senior Circuit Judge Kenneth Ripple, a Ronald Reagan appointee, methodically addressed the plaintiffs' arguments, moving from questions about the public availability of an engineering spreadsheet, to the thickness of insulation foam, to the industry trend toward high-efficiency compressors.
But beyond the facts of the case, the decision's broader impact on U.S. climate change policy is that it allows the government to incorporate the social cost of carbon.
To understand what it does, let's step into the shoes of a resource economist. From this vantage point, the climate problem isn't all that complicated to describe:
  • Scientists know that greenhouse gas pollution is disrupting the planet's climate and causing economic damage—and that the worst of both is yet to come.
  • The costs of these projected damages to society are not reflected in today's fossil fuel prices.
  • Using the social cost of carbon—or estimates of those future damages in today's dollars—policymakers can design a fix that builds in the empirical cost of climate change over time. Agencies like the Department of Energy use it in cost-benefit analyses of regulation.
The social cost of carbon isn't a particularly sonorous moniker.
One way to think of it would be as a kind of bridge to the future and back. It's a way to express the net-present value of climate chaos, for every additional metric-ton emission of carbon dioxide.
The Obama administration's estimate—about $36 a ton in 2015 (PDF)—was developed by an interagency group in 2010 and revisited last year.
The estimates are based on physical science and projections of energy use, population, and economic growth. It's complicated, rigorous, and imperfect.
The carbon cost estimates triggered congressional oversight hearings last summer, when the House Committee on Natural Resources questioned the administration's transparency and methodology.
The social cost of carbon also cropped up last week.
On Aug. 2 the White House Council on Environmental Quality issued guidance for federal agencies to use when studying the potential environmental impact of their decisions.
"Guidance" is as legally flimsy as it sounds: It's a reversible way for a president to introduce new practices into federal agencies, including unifying their approach to counting carbon.
 Footnote 86 on page 33, however, explains that when conducting cost-benefit analyses, agencies can include the social cost of carbon in their calculations. There's the beef.
It's a shadow price, a tool many companies have had for some time (PDF). State and national governments consult these estimates when writing climate policy.
Politicians, researchers, companies, diplomats all spar over what the best estimate for the social cost of carbon is.
None who are engaged in serious policy argue that the best estimate is the current rate of $0.
Soon, we may start to see exactly how much money climate change will cost us.

Links

11/08/2016

Seas Aren’t Just Rising, Scientists Say — It’s Worse Than That. They’re Speeding Up.

Washington Post - Chris Mooney

North Miami buildings are seen near the ocean. (Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images)
On a warming Earth, seas inevitably rise, as ice on land melts and makes its way to the ocean. And not only that — the ocean itself swells, because warm water expands. We already know this is happening — according to NASA, seas are currently rising at a rate of 3.5 millimeters per year, which converts to about 1.4 inches per decade.
However, scientists have long expected that the story should be even worse than this. Predictions suggest that seas should not only rise, but that the rise should accelerate, meaning that the annual rate of rise should itself increase over time. That’s because the great ice sheets, Greenland and Antarctica, should lose more and more mass, and the heat in the ocean should also increase.
The problem, or even mystery, is that scientists haven’t seen an unambiguous acceleration of sea level rise in a data record that’s considered the best for observing the problem — the one that began with the TOPEX/Poseidon satellite, which launched in late 1992 and carried an instrument, called a radar altimeter, that gives a very precise measurement of sea level around the globe. (It has since been succeeded by other satellites providing similar measurements.)
This record actually shows a decrease in the rate of sea level rise from the first decade measured by satellites (1993 to 2002) to the second one (2003 to 2012). “We’ve been looking at the altimeter records and scratching our heads, and saying, ‘why aren’t we seeing an acceleration in the satellite record?’ We should be,” said John Fasullo, a climate scientist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colorado.
In a new study in the open-access journal Scientific Reports, however, Fasullo and two colleagues say they have now resolved this problem. It turns out, they say, that sea level rise was artificially masked in the satellite record by the fact that one year before the satellite launched, the Earth experienced a major cooling pulse.
The cause? The 1991 eruption of Mount Pinatubo in the Philippines, which filled the planet’s stratosphere with aerosols that reflected sunlight away from the Earth and actually led to a slight sea level fall in ensuing years as the ocean temporarily cooled.
“What we’ve shown is that sea level acceleration is real, and it continues to be going on, it’s ongoing, and we understand why you don’t see it in the short satellite record,” said Fasullo, who conducted the research along with scientists from the University of Colorado in Boulder and Old Dominion University.
The study was performed using a suite of 40 climate change models to determine how the Pinatubo eruption affected seas and the global distribution of water. The scientists estimate as a result that sea level not only fell between 5 and 7 millimeters due to a major ocean cooling event in the eruption’s wake, but then experienced a rebound, or bounce back, of the same magnitude once the influence of the eruption had passed.
This had a major effect on what the satellite record of sea level looks like, because the bounce-back occurred earlier in the record and made the sea level rise then appear extra fast. So the researchers conclude that while no official acceleration trend can be seen in the satellite record now, that’s an artificial consequence of Pinatubo and should be gone over time — barring another Pinatubo-like event.
“Our initial impression of sea level rise was not only influenced by climate change and the rate of change, but the response and the recovery from the eruption itself,” says Fasullo. “Those effects largely have ebbed by now, and once we get a few more years into the altimeter record, we should see a clear acceleration. That’s really the punch line of the article.”
In fact, the researchers also removed the sea level effect of Pinatubo, and found that when they did so they could see sea level rise acceleration happening already.
Another study published last year also applied corrections to this body of satellite data, and similarly found that sea level rise has accelerated in the last 15 years.


If carbon emissions continue unabated, expanding oceans and massive ice melt would threaten global coastal communities, according to new projections. (Daron Taylor/The Washington Post) 

One sea level rise expert who was not involved in the new study, Robert Kopp of Rutgers University, praised the work in response to a query from the Post.
The study, Kopp explained by email, found that the Pinatubo eruption would have caused seas to fall “just before the start of the altimetry record, the recovery from which was spread out of the remainder of the 1990s and therefore masked some of the acceleration that would otherwise have been seen in the tide-gauge record between the 1990s and the 2000s. This makes strong physical sense.”
It also aligns better with actual observations from Greenland and Antarctica. Scientists have shown that both of the Earth’s major ice sheets have seen an accelerating rate of ice loss in recent years, which ought to help drive an accelerating rate of sea level as well.
A record of Greenland mass loss based on satellite data from 2002 to the present day. Data are in gigatons, or GT, equivalent to 1 billion metric tons. (NASA)
The key question then becomes just how fast the annual rate of sea level rise can actually increase. In one thought experiment recently, former NASA climate scientist James Hansen calculated the consequences if the “doubling time” for ice loss is as fast as 10 years — finding dramatic sea level increases as a result.
“Doubling times of 10, 20 or 40 years yield sea level rise of several meters in 50, 100 or 200 years,” Hansen’s study concluded. However, it is far from clear at this point that ice loss is actually increasing this rapidly.
So far, the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change officially estimates that the high-end sea-level rise projection for 2100 is lower than some of these scenarios, closer to about 1 meter (3.3 feet) by that year. But that has recently been challenged by new work estimating that Antarctica alone could add this much to global sea levels by 2100 if high levels of human greenhouse gas emissions continue.
Fasullo says that debate — over precisely how fast acceleration happens, or where that leaves us in 2100 — remains unresolved. For now, he says, at least it’s pretty clear that the acceleration is actually happening as expected.
“Accelerated sea level rise is real, and it’s ongoing, and it’s not something we should doubt based on the altimeter record,” said Fasullo.

Links

Sydney Opera House Targets 'Carbon Neutral' Status By 2023

BusinessGreen - Michael Holder

Iconic Australian landmark reveals plan to slash its environmental footprint
Sydney Opera House has put environmental and sustainability targets centre stage as part of a new roadmap towards achieving certified 'carbon neutral' status by 2023.
As part of its third three-year Environmental Sustainability Plan, covering 2017-19, the Opera House has committed to achieving a seven per cent reduction in its carbon footprint by 2019, in line with the Australian National Target of a 26-28 per cent reduction by 2030 from 2005 levels.
In addition, through measures such as metering upgrades, improved air conditioning and developing a peak energy strategy, the Australian landmark is targeting a 14 per cent cut in energy use by 2019 from a baseline of average electricity use levels seen between 2003 and 2008. It is then targeting a 20 per cent reduction in energy use from this baseline by 2023.
Moreover, by 2019 the Opera House is planning to develop a climate change resilience strategy "to address long-term impacts of climate change on [the] building and business", as well as a sustainable transport plan aimed at encouraging customers and staff away from single passenger car transport.
Scientists have previously warned Sydney Opera House is one of a host of global landmarks are at risk from rising sea levels resulting from climate change. 
Launched last week, the plan also sets out an 80 per cent construction waste recycling target for its renewal project to upgrade the Opera House over the coming decade, as well as plans to review and audit its water use targets.
The roadmap is part of the Opera House's aim tp achieve 'carbon neutral' status in line with the Australian Government's National Carbon Offset Standard by 2023, when the building will celebrate its 50th anniversary.
Last year, the Opera House was awarded a four-star Green Star rating by the Green Building Council of Australia, and it is now targeting a five-star rating by its 2023 anniversary year.
Since launching its first Environmental Sustainability Plan in 2010, the Opera House claims it has saved A$1m in electricity costs, cut its energy use by 75 per cent, and increased recycling of its waste from 20 per cent to 65 per cent.
Furthermore, the cultural centre has run four of its annual 'Vivid Live' performing arts festival events to 'carbon neutral' standard, introduced food recycling for charities and received several awards for sustainability, according to the latest plan.
"This is important work," said Louise Herron, Sydney Opera House CEO. "As custodians of a building that has become a symbol of contemporary Australia, what we do matters. This ESP seeks to honour that responsibility by embedding environmental sustainability in everything we do and inspiring greater community environmental awareness."

Links

The Blob That Cooked the Pacific

National GeographicCraig Welch

When a deadly patch of warm water shocked the West Coast, some feared it was a preview of our future oceans.
Thousands of California sea lions, such as this one on rocks near Canada's Vancouver Island, died in 2014 and 2015. Many starved as they struggled to find food in an unusually warm eastern Pacific. Paul Nicklen
The first fin whale appeared in Marmot Bay, where the sea curls a crooked finger around Alaska's Kodiak Island. A biologist spied the calf drifting on its side, as if at play. Seawater flushed in and out of its open jaws. Spray washed over its slack pink tongue. Death, even the gruesome kind, is usually too familiar to spark alarm in the wild north. But late the next morning, the start of Memorial Day weekend, passengers aboard the ferry Kennicott spotted another whale bobbing nearby. Her blubber was thick. She looked healthy. But she was dead too.
Kathi Lefebvre is talking about the whales as we crunch across a windy, rocky beach, 200 miles north of Kodiak. In a typical year eight whales are found dead in the western Gulf of Alaska. But in 2015 at least a dozen popped up in June alone, their bodies so buoyant that gulls used them as fishing platforms. All summer the Pacific Ocean heaved rotting remains into rocky coves along the more than 1,000-mile stretch from Anchorage to the Aleutian Islands. Whole families of brown bears feasted on their carcasses.
Lefebvre, a research scientist at NOAA's Northwest Fisheries Science Center in Seattle, Washington, had examined eye fluid from one of the carcasses in a failed attempt to winnow the cause of death. Now the two of us are on Kachemak Bay in Homer, Alaska, inching toward a wheezing, dying sea otter sprawled out on the shore. Otter deaths are skyrocketing on the shoreline beneath the snowcapped Kenai Mountains, so Lefebvre is here to see whether the fates of these otters and whales are somehow intertwined.
Jellyfish-like animals known as "by-the-wind sailors" blanket an Oregon beach near an old shipwreck. Some of the same unusual wind patterns and currents that recently warmed the Pacific pushed these floating creatures by the millions onto beaches from Southern California to British Columbia. Photograph by Tiffany Boothe, Seaside Aquarium
In the past few years death had become a bigger part of life in the ocean off North America's West Coast. Millions of sea stars melted away in tide pools from Santa Barbara, California, to Sitka, Alaska, their bodies dissolving, their arms breaking free and wandering off. Hundreds of thousands of ocean-feeding seabirds tumbled dead onto beaches. Twenty times more sea lions than average starved in California. I watched scientists lift sea otter carcasses onto orange sleds as they perished in Homer—79 turned up dead there in one month. By year's end, whale deaths in the western Gulf of Alaska would hit a staggering 45. Mass fatalities can be as elemental in nature as wildfire in a lodgepole pine forest, whipping through quickly, killing off the weak and clearing the way for rebirth. But these mysterious casualties all shared one thing: They overlapped with a period when West Coast ocean waters were blowing past modern temperature records.
As hotter oceans destroy coral reefs in the tropics and melting ice alters life in the Arctic, it's been easy to overlook how much warm water can reshape temperate seas. No more. Between 2013 and earlier this year, some West Coast waters grew so astonishingly hot that the marine world experienced unprecedented upheaval. Animals showed up in places they'd never been. A toxic bloom of algae, the biggest of its kind on record, shut down California's crab industry for months. Key portions of the food web crashed. It's not clear if greenhouse gas emissions exacerbated this ocean heat wave or if the event simply represented an outer edge of natural weather and climate patterns. But the phenomenon left daunting questions: Was this a quirk, an unlikely confluence of extremes that conspired to make life harsh for some sea creatures? Or was it, as one scientist says, a "dress rehearsal"—a preview, perhaps, of what hotter seas may one day bring as climate change unleashes its fever in the Pacific?
Humpback whales feast on fish in Monterey Bay, California. Anchovies were scarce in many areas in 2015, but so many congregated in the bay that Jim Harvey, director of Moss Landing Marine Labs, watched from his window as 50 or 60 whales dined on themat once. "That's not normal," he says.
While Lefebvre and I are pondering our next move, a radio call comes in. Another dead otter has surfaced on Homer Spit, five miles away. We retrace our steps to a dusty parking lot, pile into a pickup, and head off.
Beginning in late 2013, a bewildering patch of warm water formed in the Gulf of Alaska. A stubborn atmospheric high-pressure system, nicknamed the "Ridiculously Resilient Ridge," was keeping storms at bay. Just as blowing across hot coffee frees heat, winds usually churn and cool the sea's surface. Instead, heat within this shifting mass, which University of Washington climatologist Nick Bond dubbed "the blob," built up and morphed into a wider patch along North America's West Coast, where it met warm-water masses creeping north. Sea temperatures in some places rose seven degrees Fahrenheit higher than average. Some patches of ocean were hotter than ever recorded. At its peak the warm water covered about 3.5 million square miles from Mexico to Alaska, an area larger than the contiguous United States.

Lauren E. James, NGM staff. Sources: Nick Bond, University of Washington; Raphael Kudela, university of California, Santa cruz
 Two Long, Hot Years
Starting in the winter of 2013, weak winds failed to stir up and cool the northeast Pacific Ocean. Heat accumulated and then spread along the Pacific coast until late 2015, shifting marine life, shuffling the food web, and fueling a massive bloom of toxic algae. The warm water spread farther, went deeper, and lasted longer than at any other time in recorded history.
Wild, Wild West Coast
Algae typically bloom in a few places for a few weeks every spring. From spring to summer of 2015, as warm waters met nutrients rising from the deep, algae spread from Southern California to Alaska. With the additional heat, these algal blooms lasted longer, and many were highly toxic.
 Warmer Deep Water
Heat extended to ocean depths of 1,300 feet in some places. A temperature rise of even a single degree can disrupt an ecosystem. Heat remains deep in the ocean, even though the surface cooled in late 2015.
A Refuge From the Heat
As waters warmed, wildlife moved into Monterey Bay to feed in cool, nutrient-rich water rising from the deep canyon. In 2015, high concentrations of toxic algae lasted longer than usual, harming animals and making some shellfish unsafe to eat.

Did planet-warming carbon dioxide from fossil fuels contribute to this event? No one knows for sure. One controversial notion suggests that the rapid retreat of Arctic sea ice is making the polar jet stream wavier, allowing weather systems to persist longer. A more accepted theory pegs this heat to normal atmospheric fluctuations in the jet stream triggered by warmth in the tropics. But even researchers subscribing to that theory don't necessarily rule out a secondary role for climate change. "Is long-term warming somehow the puppeteer controlling things in the background?" asks Nate Mantua, at NOAA's Southwest Fisheries Science Center in Santa Cruz, California. "I haven't seen proof, but it's clearly a prime suspect."
Alaska's Sick and Dying Otters
A dying sea otter takes its last breaths. The population of sea otters in Kachemak Bay is considered healthy, but the number of strandings near Homer, Alaska, in 2015 surprised scientists and volunteers, who often responded to several otter deaths in a day.

Unscrambling this weird behavior is difficult because the world's largest ocean is so confounding to begin with. Overlapping patterns that can last for decades already drive temperature swings. Every few years or decades the eastern Pacific flips from a food-rich, cold-water place to something warmer, a cycle called the Pacific Decadal Oscillation. El Niño, the periodic tropical warming, boosts temperatures in North America. An ocean freeway, the California Current, ushers cool water south from Canada to Baja California. Along the way, winds push warm surface waters offshore, causing upwelling, which draws much cooler, nutrient-rich seas from below.
All these volatile shifts can redistribute marine life. It just doesn't usually wind up like this. "When all is said and done, I think people will see this as the most economically and ecologically consequential event in our historical record," Mantua says of the recent warming.
Seeking to understand the magnitude of this episode, I am miles off the Oregon coast, weeks before visiting Alaska. The Elakha, a 54-foot research boat, is cutting through rolling chop beneath a milky sky. Bill Peterson, in jeans and a weathered craft-beer T-shirt, kneels on deck, face pressed into a red cooler. It holds the contents of a net his colleagues just hauled up from the sloshing depths. The NOAA oceanographer is here to show me how thoroughly the eastern Pacific has changed. "Oh my, that's ugly," he says. Over his shoulder, I glance down at the bottom of the ocean food web. I see only slop the color of motor oil. That's his point.
Near Petersburg, Alaska, a worker examines the dorsal fin of an orca. This animal likely died of natural causes, but exposure to toxic algae created by unusually warm water is a suspected cause in the deaths of many humpback and fin whales.
Every two weeks for 20 years, Peterson's team has come here to gather the minuscule plants and animals that form the foundation of one of the planet's most productive marine systems. The prize course in this buffet is supposed to be inch-long krill. Shaped like shrimps, they are gobbled by auklets, cohos, basking sharks, and whales. Anchovies and sardines eat them and then get wolfed by bigger fish and sea lions. At this time of year, krill should be abundant, but Peterson's haul reveals mostly soupy algae and small jellyfish, which provide little sustenance. His team hasn't seen krill in months. "It's been like this nonstop," he says.
Higher ocean temperatures have thrown this system out of whack. Not long after the warmth arrived, shelled octopuses more common in the South Pacific appeared off Southern California. Tropical sunfish and blue sharks were caught in the North Pacific. Market squid, common off California, laid eggs in southeast Alaska. A few venomous yellow-bellied sea snakes from Central America slithered across beaches near Los Angeles. Peterson's team caught tropical or subtropical zooplankton he'd never seen: rainbow-hued, beetle-shaped copepods; minuscule iridescent creatures from Hawaii; tiny crustaceans with cobalt egg sacs. He cataloged nearly 20 new species that belonged far away.
A mola, or ocean sunfish, chases a by-the-wind sailor. With temperatures in some places reaching seven degrees Fahrenheit above average, many subtropical marine animals, such as this sunfish, came close to Pacific shores.
Dead pelagic red crabs, also known as tuna crabs, crowd the sea surface near Monterey Bay. These crabs appeared in unusually high numbers in 2015, frequently washing ashore and coating California coastlines.

Compared with krill, these zooplankton were limp-lettuce side salads: smaller and less nutritious. As this low-cal diet coursed through the food web, larval walleye pollock, common in the Gulf of Alaska, reached their lowest numbers in three decades. Halibut caught in Cook Inlet had mushy flesh—a syndrome associated with poor nutrition. Coho salmon returned to West Coast streams as malnourished runts. These changes coincided with other shifts. Sardines, already in decline, decreased so much that an industry made famous by John Steinbeck's novel Cannery Row shut down for the first time since rebounding from its collapse in the 1950s. Sardine and anchovy populations are cyclical; their precipitous drop likely had little to do with warm water. But the impact was more pronounced because the unusual heat redistributed the remaining fish. Anchovies, already dwindling, seemed to vanish almost everywhere except Monterey Bay, where they gathered in great numbers, creating a weird feeding frenzy. At one point, 50 or more whales dined in the bay at once. In the Pacific Northwest humpbacks cruised into the Columbia River in search of food. Birds suffered too. At least a hundred thousand blue-footed Cassin's auklets, small gray-feathered island nesters that eat krill, starved to death. It was one of the biggest die-offs of birds in U.S. history. Then, months later, hundreds of thousands of common murres died too.
Perhaps most visible were the skinny, sick sea lion pups that surfed ashore in California, loose fur drooping over bones, looking like children wrapped in parents' clothes. They collapsed under porches and parked trucks. One curled into a chair on a hotel patio. Another slipped into a booth at a seaside restaurant. Without sardines or anchovies, their mothers ate junk-food diets of squid, hake, and rockfish, and weaned pups early. More than 3,000 were stranded in five months.
Chugging back to his office in Newport, Oregon, Peterson is baffled. After a lifetime studying the sea, he finds this warm ocean unfamiliar and disorienting, "like looking out the window and seeing a macaw fly by."
A giant Pacific octopus moves along the coast of British Columbia. Recent changes in the Pacific temporarily altered migration patterns and food for many creatures, but it will take years for scientists to fully understand how marine life was affected.
A dying wolf eel curls up among dead prawns in Washington State's Hood Canal. Eels and other animals died when warm seawater washed into the canal in 2014. The canal's southern reaches didn't fully flush, which depleted oxygen.
It's not that the blob is the new normal. It isn't. Few if any of these changes are permanent. Even if they were, it wouldn't mean the sea was dying. Ocean life will continue. But the blob offers something of an analogue for future seas under climate change. And marine life in this sea of tomorrow will look very different.
Warmer temperatures speed fish metabolisms, requiring them to eat more, just as their food declines. Some fish may see tinier bodies, more disease, and, in many cases, falling populations, according to recent studies. Already, according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, many fish and plankton are heading toward the poles in search of cooler temperatures. As productive areas grow scarcer with less cold water, fish and predators will congregate in fewer places, creating new challenges. During the recent heat wave, more West Coast whales appeared to get tangled in fishing gear or debris. From 2000 to 2012, rescue crews fielded about 10 reports a year. Forty-eight were confirmed in 2015.
And when creatures show up somewhere new, our relationship with the sea can shift too. In Pacifica, California, I visit Richard Shafer, a lanky 58-year-old electrician who free-dives for fish with a speargun. As the heat wave drove game fish north from Mexico, fishing charters off Los Angeles had their best season in memory. So in August 2015, Shafer took a charter to an offshore bank west of San Diego. He speared a yellowtail, and then a hungry sea lion darted past. Knowing that sea lions steal big fish, especially in the absence of sardines, Shafer pulled his yellowtail close and swam toward the boat, only to be bitten on the wrist by a seven-foot smooth hammerhead. These sharks are rarely seen in California, and rarely attack, yet there were several encounters in 2015 during what one scientist called "an endless parade of hammerheads" lured by warm water. The animal severed Shafer's tendon and fractured a pinkie and knuckle, requiring 40 stitches. Each change in the sea can trigger another that no one sees coming.
The sky pinks with the dying day as Kathi Lefebvre hops from a pickup truck onto a pebbly stretch of Homer Spit and stares down at the dead otter. Sea wash muddies the pale fur of its face. Otters in previous years mostly died from complications of a streptococcal infection. This year some of the dead look emaciated, while others look almost fit. Interns with the Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuge don blue latex gloves and begin an examination. One intern is moved nearly to tears. Another tells Lefebvre about an otter she'd seen shuddering in spasms the week before. Lefebvre perks up.


WATCH: An otter shudders and gasps in a spasm.                                                                                                                                                                        
"The thing you're describing, the tremors in the whole body?" Lefebvre says. "I've seen that. In sea lions."
In 1998, as a Ph.D. student at the University of California, Santa Cruz, Lefebvre learned that dozens of sea lions were turning up sick and twitchy. Lefebvre had a hunch why: Each spring, a single-celled toxic alga called Pseudo-nitzschia blooms in small patches, usually for a week, maybe two, producing a neurotoxin called domoic acid, which accumulates in shellfish. When ingested by people, this toxin can cause seizures, memory loss, even death. It also can harm wildlife. In 1961, a Santa Cruz newspaper told of a mysterious invasion of sooty shearwaters "fresh from a feast of anchovies." The seabirds bashed into windows and died on streets. Alfred Hitchcock used the incident as part of his inspiration for The Birds. Scientists tracking the mystery decades later unearthed old samples of plankton pulled from Monterey Bay in 1961. They detected high levels of Pseudo-nitzschia.
The Pacific Marine Mammal Center in Laguna Beach, California, took in hundreds of emaciated sea lion pups in 2015. As anchovies and sardines dwindled, thousands of sea lions had to rely on less nutritious food or search harder for prey driven away by warm waters, leading many to starve.
When Lefebvre found domoic acid in the feces of sick sea lions in 1998, it was the first evidence that this type of toxic bloom could hurt marine mammals. And blooms that year were particularly bad. El Niño had brought withering ocean heat to California, igniting the most ferocious bloom on record—until last year.
In April 2015 algae bloomed, but instead of dissipating after a few weeks, the bloom grew into a monster, morphing and shifting, stretching over 2,000 miles, from California's Channel Islands to Kodiak. No one had seen anything like it. Some shellfish harvests closed along the coast. Toxin concentrations were 30 times greater than what would normally be considered high. Tests found domoic acid in some fish, such as anchovies, at amounts too dangerous for people to eat, a rarity. The toxin appeared to sicken hundreds of sea lions, seabirds, porpoises, and seals. Video from Washington State showed a sea lion suffering a toxin-induced seizure, something never seen that far north. Blooms dragged into November.
Then there were Alaska's dead whales, primarily fins and humpbacks. Most were too remote or too far gone to test. A few that washed up in British Columbia showed traces of domoic acid, but the toxin flushes so quickly it's impossible to know if the dose was large or small. Scientists lacked proof, but most shared a theory: Whales ate krill, copepods, or fish dosed by algal toxins, which killed them outright or scrambled their brains, hampering navigation and feeding. "Given that we've ruled out most other scenarios, what is most prominent in my mind is toxic algae," says Andrew Trites, director of the Marine Mammal Research Unit at the University of British Columbia.
Standing on Homer Spit, Lefebvre wonders aloud if algae played a role in killing Alaska's otters. She sets down plastic bags to collect specimens and pulls on gloves. Leaning over the stiffening otter, she bends to her work.

True to its B-movie name, the blob began fading in December 2015, its heat sinking deep into the sea with the arrival of a powerful El Niño. But divining what this heat portends will take years. New research suggests that heat waves like the blob may become more common and intense because of climate change. Scientists foresee "higher extremes, more unusual events. It gets more chaotic," says Raphael Kudela, an ocean sciences professor at the University of California, Santa Cruz. Scientists project that toxic blooms will be more frequent, more widespread, and more toxic.
That could spell trouble for people too. I meet Dick Ogg in his paint-splattered khakis, strolling down a wooden ramp at Bodega Bay's Spud Point Marina. He's rebuilding a hold on the Karen Jeanne. The commercial fisherman chases salmon, albacore, and sablefish but makes his real money gathering Dungeness crab. Yet his boat hasn't moved much in months. Crab remained unsafe to eat long after toxic blooms vanished, so California delayed its crab harvest for months, at a loss of $48 million. The governor sought disaster relief from the U.S. government. Out-of-work deckhands lived off gift cards and a marina food bank. The closest Ogg came to fishing was helping regulators catch crab to test for toxins. "A lot of folks are really hurting," Ogg says glumly.
Market squid, which typically spawn off California, swim by their eggs near Klemtu, British Columbia. In 2015 squid eggs in the eastern Pacific were found as far north as Alaska.
Yet not all of what the blob produced is a harbinger of something. Given warming over decades, rather than the blob's span of roughly two years, plants and animals may adapt or move. Some die-offs might have happened without the blob. Sea star deaths, while hastened by the warm water, were actually caused by a virus that hit well before the blob. California sea lion populations may simply have grown too large.
And more changes are coming. Rising seas are reshaping coastlines. Natural low-oxygen zones in deep waters are expanding. Ocean acidification is making life harder for shellfish. Predicting the future is messy—especially when we barely understand the present.
Lefebvre never solved the otter mystery. By year's end, 304 were dead—nearly five times the recent average. One-third of the carcasses that scientists tested were positive for toxic algae. But strep infection was diagnosed as the primary cause of death for most otters. Any role that the blob played in exacerbating the infection remains a riddle. Did algal toxins weaken the animals? Did warm water somehow make things worse? "We still don't know how all these tweaks in our world come together," Lefebvre says.
Weeks later, I have a similar chat with Julia Parrish, a bird expert at the University of Washington, who has been tracking the murres' deaths. She doesn't know if the seabirds chased scarce food to strange places, got mixed up by domoic acid, or were pushed ashore by winds. "I am still just mystified," she tells me.
And that, more than anything, I now realize, may be our new normal: the unfathomable gulf between the sea we thought we knew and the one we're rapidly creating.

Links

An Epic Middle East Heat Wave Could Be Global Warming’s Hellish Curtain-Raiser

Washington PostHugh Naylor

Iraqis jump off the ruins of an old building into the Tigris River to beat the heat in Baghdad on Aug. 1. The temperature in Baghdad reached 117 degrees. (Ali Abdul Hassan/AP)
— Record-shattering temperatures this summer have scorched countries from Morocco to Saudi Arabia and beyond, as climate experts warn that the severe weather could be a harbinger of worse to come.
In coming decades, U.N. officials and climate scientists predict that the region's mushrooming populations will face extreme water scarcity, temperatures almost too hot for human survival and other consequences of global warming.
If that happens, conflicts and refugee crises far greater than those now underway are probable, said Adel Abdellatif, a senior adviser at the U.N. Development Program's Regional Bureau for Arab States who has worked on studies about the effect of climate change on the region.
"This incredible weather shows that climate change is already taking a toll now and that it is — by far — one of the biggest challenges ever faced by this region," he said.
These countries have grappled with remarkably warm summers in recent years, but this year has been particularly brutal.
Parts of the United Arab Emirates and Iran experienced a heat index — a measurement that factors in humidity as well as temperature — that soared to 140 degrees in July, and Jiddah, Saudi Arabia, recorded an all-time high temperature of nearly 126 degrees. Southern Morocco's relatively cooler climate suddenly sizzled last month, with temperatures surging to highs between 109 and 116 degrees. In May, record-breaking temperatures in Israel led to a surge in ­heat-related illnesses.
Temperatures in Kuwait and Iraq startled observers. On July 22, the mercury climbed to 129 degrees in the southern Iraqi city of Basra. A day earlier, it reached 129.2 in Mitribah, Kuwait. If confirmed by the World Meteorological Organization, the two temperatures would be the hottest ever recorded in the Eastern Hemisphere.
The bad news isn't over, either. Iraq's heat wave is expected to continue this week.
Stepping outside is like "walking into a fire," said Zainab Guman, a 26-year-old university student who lives in Basra. "It's like everything on your body — your skin, your eyes, your nose — starts to burn," she said.
Guman has rarely left home during daylight hours since June, when temperatures started rising above 120 degrees and metal objects outside turned into searing-hot hazards.
People escape the searing summer heat at a swimming pool in in Basra, Iraq, on Aug. 1. The temperature that day reached 120 degrees. (Nabil Al-Jurani/AP)
About that time, Aymen Karim also began feeling trapped.
The 28-year-old engineer at a government-run oil company in Basra said employees were ordered to stay home for several days in the past month. He and his family try not to go outside before 7 p.m.
"We're prisoners," Karim said.
Bassem Antoine, an Iraqi economist, said the weather has inflicted serious damage to the country's economy. He estimates that Iraq's gross domestic product — about $230 billion annually — has probably contracted 10 to 20 percent during the summer heat.
Iraqi officials say scores of farmers across the country have been struggling with wilting crops, and general workforce productivity has decreased.
Hospitals, meanwhile, have seen an uptick in the number of people suffering from dehydration and heat exhaustion.
Tens of thousands of Iraqis displaced by battles between government forces and Islamic State militants have endured the heat in tents and other makeshift shelters. Humanitarian organizations have been unable to reach all of them because of budget constraints, restrictions by Iraq's government and risks associated with operating in war zones.
"A lot of these people are probably dying, but it's hard to know," said an official at an aid organization who was not authorized to discuss the issue publicly and so spoke on the condition of anonymity.
In Baghdad, the capital, the temperature measured at the international airport has reached 109 degrees or higher nearly every day since June 19. The city has been 10 and even 20 degrees warmer than normal for this time of year.
The government has declared multiple mandatory official holidays because of the heat. When that happens, many public employees turn up to work anyway because of the air conditioning available at government offices.
Most Iraqi homes and businesses suffer daily power cuts for 12 hours or more, and most Iraqis — unlike their rich neighbors in Kuwait and Saudi Arabia — are too poor to afford 24-hour air conditioning anyway. Such a luxury requires paying expensive fees for gas-powered generators.
During daylight hours, Baghdad's streets are empty, but some businesses remain open. It's either sweat at work or starve at home, said Eissa Mohsen, who owns a fruit stand in the Karrada area of downtown Baghdad.
"Look over there! That's an air-conditioning unit, but I can't afford to pay the generator fees to run it," he said at his shop on a recent day.
The immediate cause of all this misery is a stubborn ­high-pressure system, but a fundamental shift in the country's weather patterns appears to be taking place, said Mahmoud ­Abdul-Latif, spokesman for Iraq's meteorological department. In Baghdad, he said, the number of days with temperatures at 118 degrees or higher has more than doubled in recent years.
"If you look back 40 years ago, you'd have these temperatures for four or five days, but then the wind would kick up dust and that would cool the surface. That's just not happening now," he said.
Climate scientists say this shouldn't be surprising.
A study published by the journal Nature Climate Change in October predicted that heat waves in parts of the Persian Gulf could threaten human survival toward the end of the century. Researchers at the Max Planck Institute for Chemistry and the Cyprus Institute in Nicosia recently predicted a similarly grim fate for the Middle East and North Africa, a vast area currently home to about a half-billion people.
The region's governments are generally not prepared to deal with rapidly growing populations and climactic shifts, said Francesca de Châtel, an Amsterdam-based expert on Middle Eastern water issues. For years, she said, they have failed to address these problems adequately despite warnings from climate experts and U.N. agencies, and it may be too late now.
The United Nations predicts that the combined population of 22 Arab countries will grow from about 400 million to nearly 600 million by 2050. That would place tremendous stress on countries where climate scientists predict significantly lower rainfall and saltier groundwater from rising sea levels. Already, most countries in the region face acute water crises because of dry climates, surging consumption and wasteful agricultural practices.
Analysts point to inadequate government handling of an unprecedented drought in Syria as a trigger for the country's devastating civil war, which has produced extraordinary refugee flows that have spilled into Europe.
Last year, Iraqis rallied in Baghdad against their government's inability to provide enough electricity during another scorching summer heat wave. Little, if anything, resulted from those demonstrations. According to some estimates, Iraq's population of about 33 million people will nearly double by 2050.
"The countries in the region are not prepared to cope with the effects of climate change," said de Châtel. Such a blistering future doesn't seem like a far-off possibility to 33-year-old Arkan Farhan, who lives with his family near Baghdad in a tin hut at camp for people displaced by the Islamic State.
Last month, he said, he contracted typhoid from a communal water source that has become particularly crowded — and filthy — this summer. To cool off, his sons use it to fill a pan for bathing.
This month, his 69-year-old father, Jassam, was taken to the hospital after passing out from the heat.
"Fortunately, he was only bruised. He didn't break any bones," Farhan said of his father while sitting in his sweltering shack. "Iraqis are strong people. But this heat is like a fire. Can people live in fire?"

Links

Lethal Heating is a citizens' initiative