The Commonwealth has used new powers to cancel States’ participation in
global climate action
The latest move on emissions is ‘a global embarrassment’ for
the federal government, says Victoria’s energy, environment and
climate change minister, Lily D’Ambrosio.Photograph: Dean Lewins/AAP
The Morrison government has used sweeping new powers to override state and
territory government support for an international agreement to cut greenhouse
gas emissions.
The federal government has deployed recently passed
laws to overturn the participation of five states and territories in the
global Under 2 Coalition.
In an email dated 23 November, an official with the Department of Foreign
Affairs and Trade told his counterpart in the Victorian government that its
participation in the coalition was “no longer in operation”.
The email warned the Victorian government that under the new Foreign Relations
(States and Territories) Act 2020, sign up to the agreement was now
illegitimate.
The email said Victoria had 14 days to tell the global organisation it had
“failed to properly classify” the state’s involvement in a 2015 Memorandum of
Understanding.
Two-hundred-and-sixty sub-national governments worldwide have signed
up to the Under 2 coalition, representing 1.75 billion people and 50% of the
global economy.
Members commit to keeping global temperature rises
to well below 2C, with efforts to reach 1.5C.
Thirty-five states and
regions in the coalition have committed to reaching net zero emissions by 2050
or earlier.
“[T]he MOU has also been invalidated for a number of other states and
territories,” the official said, naming the ACT, Northern Territory,
Queensland
and South Australia. He did not cite NSW, which has lately signed up.
Lily D’Ambrosio, Victoria’s energy, environment and climate change minister,
said DFAT had used a technicality that was “illogical” to cancel her state’s
participation.
“It’s just a really ridiculous technicality,” D’Ambrosio said. “It’s egregious.
They are vandals.”
The move came less than a fortnight after the Glasgow climate summit ended. The
Morrison government had weathered extensive criticism at the event for being
among the few rich nations to avoid raising their 2030 emission reduction
targets.
“This is going to be a global embarrassment, not for the Victorian government
but the federal government that has already covered itself in ridicule on the
climate change stage,” D’Ambrosio said. “Rather than addressing the urgency of
climate change, they are actually putting forward more barriers.”
A spokesperson for Foreign Affairs Minister Marise Payne said the Under 2
Coalition MOU had not come to the minister for a decision.
“The MOU was not properly notified by the relevant states and territory under
the Foreign Relations Act 2020 and was therefore automatically invalidated by
operation of the Act,” the spokesperson said.
DFAT was also approached for comment, as was energy minister Angus Taylor.
The DFAT official suggested in the email if Victoria wanted to sign up to the
Under 2 coalition’s 2021 MOU, his department would consider approving it. He
also said Victoria should join with other jurisdictions to make a single
submission.
“Under what conditions would they be prepared to consider an application?”
D’Ambrosio said. “Are they saying that if there’s one or two states that maybe
hadn’t wanted to pursue it or have delayed it, then everyone else will be held
up?”
Meaghan Scanlon, Queensland’s minister for the environment and the Great Barrier
Reef, said her state had also received the cancellation advice.
“Clearly, the Morrison government aren’t content with their own failures on
climate change, they’re now trying to stop the states from taking action.” she
said.
“Surely their time would be better spent funding renewable energy projects or
delivering a credible policy on reducing emissions, than on playing silly
bureaucratic games,” Scanlon said.
Queensland intends to re-apply “because it is an important and useful coalition
of like-minded sub-national governments that want to act on climate action”.
Shane Rattenbury, the ACT’s climate change minister, said his government is yet
to told of the cancellation, and continued to work with the global group, most
recently this week on zero-emission vehicles.
“The Under 2 coalition is a helpful network of sub-national governments to work
together on climate action,” he said.
NSW is understood to be discussing with DFAT the application of the new act on
its involvement in the coalition.
Chris Bowen, federal Labor’s climate spokesperson said the intervention would
probably viewed internationally as another blow to Australia’s reputation.
“The states are doing their best to fill the federal climate vacuum but this
demonstrates the need for national leadership,” Bowen said.
“It’s a blight on
Scott Morrison
that he hasn’t updated the medium-term targets the coalition government agreed
to revisit,” he added.
Polly Hemming, an adviser in the Australia Institute’s Climate and Energy
Program, said local governments had played an important role in advancing
climate action.
Examples include California lifting its ambitions to cut emissions during the
Trump years in the US, and in Australia where states have long led the way.
“While the commonwealth government is the only level of government that can
commit Australia to a foreign treaty, it’s the state governments that will face
the full costs of climate change induced disasters,” she said.
“The ACT legislative assembly and Sydney city council have endorsed a global
fossil fuel non-proliferation treaty,” Hemming added.
“We can only wonder if they will be getting emails from federal bureaucrats in
the near future as well?”
New research says up to six million early deaths could be
avoided through the strategic closure of the worst polluting
power stations. (Credit: Canva).
The early and strategic closure of the world’s worst polluting power
stations, including inefficient fossil fuel and biomass plants, could
avoid the premature deaths of up to six million people by 2050, new
research has found.
The research,published in the journal Nature Climate Change, found that retiring the most polluting and most harmful power stations
– by focusing on addressing air pollution concerns as well as reducing
greenhouse gas emissions – would save millions of lives.
The
research has been led by professor Qiang Zhang, of Tsinghua
University in Beijing, who modelled the potential impacts of both
greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution caused by power generation,
particularly coal.
The research identified several power stations that were
disproportionately responsible for air pollution and poor health – and it
found that policies based on climate change concerns alone were not
sufficient to protect public health.
“Our detailed and dynamic analysis of climate, pollution and health
impacts from the future power systems at the level of individual
generating units reveals that air pollution deaths are not an automatic
and fixed co-benefit of all climate mitigation,” the research paper says.
“Rather, pollution controls and strategic retirements of the
most-polluting and harmful power plants may ultimately determine the
extent to which health co-benefits are realised.”
The research found that between 2010 and 2018, 91 per cent of the
premature deaths caused by power station pollution occurred in
lower-income or emerging economies.
These included India, China and other countries across Southeast Asia
where softer regulatory controls, closer proximity of power stations to
densely populated regions and higher industrial activity caused smog and
other particulate pollution.
The worst offenders were smaller coal generators, especially those below
300MW in generation capacity, which are more likely to be found in
developing countries, which accounted for more than half of air pollution
related deaths.
Coal plants made up 46 per cent of the world’s generation capacity, but
were responsible for 80 per cent of power generation-related air pollution
deaths.
“Even assuming successful climate change mitigation and
strong pollution controls, implementing our data-driven approach to
targeting super-polluting units for retirement and replacement could save
millions of lives worldwide by the middle of the century,” the report
says.
The research challenges the assertions of some within the Morrison
government that Australia’s ongoing exports of fossil fuels were helping
to alleviate poverty and improve health across the Asian region.
The research is the latest addition to a growing body of evidence that the
ongoing use of fossil fuels is not just a global environmental concern due
to global warming, that it is also a significant public health concern,
contributing to substantial increases in air pollution that causes major
health problems and premature deaths.
New estimates based on satellite data show Glencore’s Hail Creek mine spewed
230,000 tons of the powerful greenhouse gas a year in 2018 and 2019.
A satellite image of Glencore's open cut Hail Creek coal mine in
Australia's Bowen Basin. Source: Maxar
Just inland of Australia's east coast, roughly 200 miles from the Great Barrier
Reef, a single coal mine run by Glencore Plc emitted so much
super-warming methane
in a year that it had the same climate warming impact as the annual pollution
from more than 4 million U.S. cars.
The Hail Creek coal mine leaked an estimated 230,000 tons of methane a year in
2018 and 2019, according to researchers with SRON Netherlands Institute for
Space Research, who analyzed satellite data from the European Space Agency.
Because methane
traps over 80 times
more heat than carbon dioxide in its first two decades in the atmosphere, the
mine had the same short-term warming impact as roughly 19 million tons of CO₂ a
year.
The report is one of the first efforts by researchers to quantify just how much
methane is coming from individual mines in Australia. Coal itself produces the
most CO₂ emissions out of all fossil fuels and nearly 200 countries have
agreed on the need
to reduce its use to avoid the worst effects of climate change. The new study
shows that there's an added danger: disastrous amounts of methane emitted during
the mining process.
The Hail Creek mine is among a handful of coal operations in Australia’s Bowen
Basin identified by the researchers as super-emitters, including mines run by
BHP Group and Anglo American Plc. Hail Creek, which Glencore took over from Rio
Tinto Group in August 2018, was the biggest offender.
It accounts
for 20% of Australia’s methane emissions from coal mining even though it
produces just 1% of the nation’s coal output, according to the report, published
Monday in the Environmental Science & Technology journal.
The researchers grouped five other mines in the Bowen Basin into two clusters
because it was difficult to distinguish their individual contributions due to
their close proximity. Broadmeadow, owned jointly by BHP and Mitsubishi Corp.,
and Anglo’s Moranbah North and Grosvenor mines released 190,000 tons of methane
annually in 2018 and 2019, according to the report. Glencore's Oaky North and
Anglo's Grasstree mines emitted an estimated 150,000 tons of methane a year.
Glencore said its Bowen Basin coal business reports emissions in line with
Australia's requirements. Anglo American said it submits methane emissions
annually, by location, to the country's clean energy regulator and also makes
disclosures at a business level in its annual report. A spokesperson for BMA,
BHP’s joint-venture with Mitsubishi, said the company publishes emissions from
its Australian operations in accordance with the country’s standards.
None of the operators said how much methane comes from the individual mines
identified by the Dutch researchers. BHP spokesman Ben Dillaway told Bloomberg
in July its Broadmeadow and Goonyella Riverside mines cumulatively emit an
average of about 32,000 tons of methane a year.
The new analysis underscores just how big a problem coal is for Australia, which
lags other developed nations
in tackling climate change. Although it’s extremely vulnerable to the impacts of
rising temperatures, Australia was among the last advanced economies to set a
target to zero out emissions, has been criticized over the credibility of its
plan, and refused to join a
global pledge
to reduce methane emissions 30% by 2030.
Learn more
about the planet-warming power of methane.
The cheap and easy climate fix that can cool the planet fast. See the graphic
The findings suggest there may be “a large underreporting of methane emissions
in the national inventory,” authors including Pankaj Sadavarte and Ilse Aben
wrote. They speculated that the outsize releases from Hail Creek could have come
from surface mining operations and efforts to drain gas when expanding the
facility.
The research underscores the wide range of climate impacts from different mines.
According to the International Energy Agency, the world’s dirtiest coal emits as
much as 100 times more methane than cleaner operations. Most of the methane
reductions from coal should come from a “drastic fall” in its use, the IEA said
in an October report, though steps to minimize leaks “need to happen in
parallel.”
The Dutch researchers estimated that all six mines spewed a combined 570,000
tons of methane a year over the study period, accounting for roughly 55% of the
reported methane emissions from coal mining in Australia — despite only
contributing about 7% of the nation's production.
A closer view of Hail Creek coal mine. Source: Maxar
Australia’s Department of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources said in a
March report that it’s “premature to use satellite data to quantify emissions
from methane sources.’’ The Dutch scientists used observations from the ESA's
Sentinel-5P satellite to estimate daily methane flux rates from the mines and
compared those with emissions from global inventories and figures used in
Australia’s reports to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate
Change.
The main caveat with this approach is that the Sentinel-5P “is designed for
quantifying methane over large regions rather than precise attribution to
individual facilities,” said Riley Duren, chief executive officer of Carbon
Mapper. The nonprofit has received funding from Bloomberg Philanthropies.
But Duren said that the findings — that just a handful of mines appear to be
responsible for a disproportionate amount of emissions — broadly align with what
his team has found studying U.S. coal mines in southwest Pennsylvania using
instruments with much higher spatial resolution. Just four underground mines in
that region appear to be responsible for 22% of total U.S. methane emissions
from underground mines, or about 300,000 tons.
The Dutch research is also similar to another analysis by Kayrros SAS. The
French geoanalytics firm found earlier this year that for every ton of coal
produced in the Bowen Basin, an average of 7.5 kilograms of methane is released.
That was 47% higher than the average global methane intensity estimated by the
IEA, according to Kayrros.
Geologically older and deeper coal deposits tend to contain more methane than
shallower seams, according to the IEA, which is why emissions from surface mines
such as Hail Creek tend to be lower than underground mines. But it’s harder to
mitigate leaks from open pit reserves, where emissions are often spread over
larger areas and more diffuse.
Ilse Aben, one of the Dutch researchers, said they were surprised by the large
methane emissions coming from Hail Creek. “I hope getting attention for this
forces people to explain what is happening there,” said Aben. “It requires an
explanation.”
— With assistance by Anjali Cordeiro, and Jane Pong
The increasing frequency of dead zones will affect billions of people who
rely on the ocean for survival
Thousands of dead fish float in the Boca Ciega Bay located near the
mouth of Madeira Beach in July 2021 in Madeira Beach, Florida. Ocean
water that has lost much of its oxygen content has led to such die
offs of marine life in Florida and other parts of the US.
Credit: Octavio Jones/Getty Images
Last summer, more than 100 miles of Florida’s coastal waters became an
oxygen-depleted dead zone, littered with fish that could be seen even into Tampa
Bay. On the other side of the country, Dungeness crabs were washing onto
Oregon’s shoreline, unable to escape from water that has, in dramatic episodes,
become seasonally depleted of oxygen over the past two decades.
While
much of the conversation around our climate crisis focuses on the emission of
greenhouse gases and their effect on warming, precipitation, sea level rise and
ocean acidification, little is said about the effect of climate change on oxygen
levels, particularly in oceans and lakes. Water without adequate oxygen cannot
support life, and for the three billion people who depend on coastal fisheries
for income, declining ocean oxygen levels are catastrophic.
As ocean and atmospheric scientists focused on climate, we believe that oceanic
oxygen levels are the next big casualty of global warming. To stop this, we need
to build on the momentum of the recent COP26 summit and expand our attention to
the perilous state of oceanic oxygen levels—the life support system of our
planet. We need to accelerate ocean-based climate solutions that boost oxygen,
including nature-based solutions like those discussed at COP26.
As the amount of CO2 increases in the atmosphere, not only does it
warm air by trapping radiation, it warms water. The interplay between oceans and
the atmosphere is complex and interwoven, but simply,oceans have taken up about
90 percent
of the excess heat created by climate change during the Anthropocene. Bodies of
water can absorb CO2 and O2, but only to a temperature-dependent
limit.
Gas solubility decreases with warming temperatures; that is,
warmer water holds less oxygen. This decrease in oxygen content, coupled with a
large-scale die-off
of oxygen-generating phytoplankton resulting not just from climate change, but
from
plastic pollution
and industrial run-off, compromises ecosystems, asphyxiating marine life and
leading to further die-offs. Large swaths of the oceans have lost 10–40 percent
of their oxygen, and that loss is
expected to accelerate
with climate change.
The dramatic loss of oxygen from our bodies of water is compounding
climate-related feedback mechanisms described by scientists in many fields,
hundreds of whom signed the
2018 Kiel Declaration on Ocean Deoxygenation. This declaration has culminated in the new Global Ocean Oxygen Decade, a
project under the U.N.
Global Ocean Decade
(2021–2030).
Yet, despite years of research into climate change and
its effect on temperature, we know comparatively little about its effect on
oxygen levels and what falling oxygen levels, in turn, may do to the atmosphere.
To address this unfolding crisis, we need more research and more data.
In the past 200 years, humans have shown remarkable ability to change the planet
by altering the timescales in which the Earth cycles chemicals such as
CO2. We need to evaluate any possible solutions for their impact on
not just greenhouse gases but other critical elements of life, such as oxygen
levels.
As the financial world invests in climate change solutions
focused on CO2 drawdown, and possibly including future
geoengineering efforts
such as iron fertilization, we run the risk of causing secondary harm by
exacerbating oxygen loss. We need to evaluate potential unintended consequences
of climate solutions on the full life support system.
Beyond enhanced monitoring of oxygen and the establishment of an oxygen
accounting system, such an agenda encompasses fully valuing the ecosystem
co-benefits of carbon sequestration by our ocean’s seaweed, seagrasses,
mangroves and other wetlands. These so-called “blue carbon” nature-based
solutions are also remarkable at oxygenating our planet through photosynthesis.
The theme of COP26 chosen by the host country (U.K.) was
“nature-based solutions.” And we saw a lot of primarily terrestrial focused
(forestry) initiatives and commitments that are an excellent step forward. We
hope this year’s conference and next year’s COP27 help oceanic nature-based
solutions to come into their own, propelled by the U.N. Global Ocean Decade.
Putting oxygen into the climate story motivates us to do the work to understand
the deep systemic changes happening in our complex atmospheric and oceanic
systems. Even as we celebrated the return of humpback whales in 2020 to an
increasingly clean New York Harbor and Hudson River,
dead fish
littered the Hudson River in the summer as warmer waters carried less oxygen.
Ecosystem changes connected to physical and chemical systems-level
data may point the way to new approaches to climate solutions—ones that
encompass an enhanced understanding of the life support system of our planet and
that complement our understanding of drawdown to reduce emissions of carbon
dioxide. Roughly 40 percent of the world depends on the ocean for their
livelihoods. If we do not stop marine life from oxygen-starvation, we propagate
a further travesty on ourselves.
Human activity is causing
Earth's atmosphere to heat up much quicker than any changes which might
happen naturally, leaving many ecosystems at breaking point.
While
November's COP26 summit was the first time a global climate deal
explicitly identified fossil fuel consumption as a major driver of
climate change, climate experts have warned it has not gone far enough
to limit global warming to "well below" 2C. centigrade compared to
pre-industrial levels—a key level of the 2015 Paris Agreement.
So which countries are taking action, and which are not?
Scientific
analysts Climate Action Tracker (CAT) have examined government policy
of 40 countries that account for the vast majority of global greenhouse
gas emissions.
Its
analysis indicates less economically developed countries are struggling
the most to combat the effects wrought by their richer neighbors.
At
present, only a small group of developed markets are leading on
research, innovation and public funding, according to Steve Varley, EY
Global's vice chair of sustainability.
He told Newsweek that governments need to work more collaboratively and alongside businesses to drive change.
"A
small group of developed markets are leading the way in terms of
climate research, innovation and public funding, at a time when not
enough 'green money' is flowing to emerging markets where the impacts of
climate change are felt the most," he said.
The Very Worst
("Critically Insufficient" Countries)
CAT
notes this indicates a country's climate policies and commitments
reflecting minimal to no action and are not at all consistent with the
Paris Agreement.
Iran
Iran is one of the few countries that has not yet ratified the Paris Agreement, ArefBarahuie/Getty Images
Iran is one of the few countries that has not
ratified the Paris Agreement, and this effect has been compounded by an
economic crisis resulting from
International sanctions in place
since 2018, has meant a decrease in the export of fossil fuel oil, yet
there has been a sluggishness in embracing eco-friendly policies.
Economic
effects of sanctions and the COVID-19 pandemic has slowed climate
policy developments further,according to CAT analysts.
Russia
Although Russia in November 2020 proposed reducing its emissions by a minimum of 30 percent below 1990 levels by 2030, CAT describes this target as not representing an increase in climate actionlapandr/Getty Images
In November 2020, Russia proposed reducing its emissions by a minimum of 30 percent below 1990 levels by 2030.
But
CAT analysts do not assess the target as an increase in climate action,
"as it is simply the lower bound of the previous target's range
(25-30%)."
U.S. President Joe Biden criticised Russia—the world's fifth-largest carbon dioxide (CO2) emitter—for not attending the COP26 climate summit.
CAT
states: "Russia needs to set a more ambitious target for emissions
reductions, adopt and implement additional policies, and provide
additional finance."
Singapore
Singapore’s climate policies and commitments are deemed to reflect "minimal to no action", which are considered by the climate activist "not at all consistent with the Paris Agreement."danaibe12/Getty Images
Singapore's climate policies and commitments
reflect "minimal to no action," according to CAT. Government policy here
is "not at all consistent with the Paris Agreement," it said.
The
island city-state in Southeast Asia is also believed to be overly
reliant on natural gas, which CAT estimates provides 96 percent of the
country's electricity.
CAT
writes: "If all countries were to follow Singapore's approach, warming
could reach over 3C and up to 4C"—twice the upper target of the Paris
Agreement.
Thailand
Thailand's overall climate performance is described by CAT as "weak despite some good intentions."torwai/Getty Images
CAT analysts call Thailand's overall climate performance "weak despite some good intentions."
Thai
leaders have pledged to shift away from a dependency on coal to natural
gas over the next 20 years, but little change has been witnessed so
far.
CAT writes: "Until the next wave of Thailand's climate
strategies and its accompanying mitigation policies are implemented and
strengthened, the CAT rates Thailand's climate targets and policies as
"critically insufficient."
Turkey
Turkey is described as sitting "at a crossroads" regarding its energy futureHuseyin Bostanci/Getty Images
Turkey is "at a crossroads" regarding its energy future, CAT analysts say.
President
Erdoğan's government intends to decrease dependency on gas imports
through increased renewable energy capacity, but at the same time plans
to continue to use domestic coal for the foreseeable future.
CAT
writes: "Turkey's emissions will increase significantly under current
policies. This first NDC [Nationally Determined Contributions] is so
weak that it allows GHG [Green House Gas] emissions to essentially
double compared to current levels.
Vietnam
Vietnam lacks policies for a transition to a low-carbon economy and has not focused efforts on emissions reductionsKittikorn/Getty Images
Vietnam lacks policies for a transition to a
low-carbon economy and has not focused efforts on emissions reductions,
according to the analysts.
While the country's renewable energy
policy has witnessed "positive developments," CAT considers these
outweighed by "plans for continuing the expansion of fossil fuels."
It
writes: "Vietnam is further off track when compared with modelled
domestic pathways and the extent of reductions that need to be taking
place inside its borders with international support."
Extremely Poor Performing
"Highly Insufficient" Countries
Note
CAT rates these countries policies and actions are considered to lead
to "rising, rather than falling, emissions" tabulating to global
temperatures rising "up to 4C by end of the century."
Argentina
Argentina’s policies and actions are considered "not at all consistent with the Paris Agreement’s 1.5C temperature limit."Christian Peters/Getty Images
Argentina's
policies and actions are considered "not at all consistent with the
Paris Agreement's 1.5C temperature limit," by CAT analysts.
Beset
by economic trouble, the country failed to introduce a single green
measure of note in its latest recovery stimulus plan, according to the
researchers.
Former President Mauricio Macri's government declared
a "climate emergency" in 2019, but little action has been taken since,
analysts found.
Australia
Australia is one of several COP26 nations unsupportive of agreeing to the request for all countries to return next year with stronger commitments to slash greenhouse gas emissions by 2030Tim Allen/Getty Images
Australia was one of several countries which
proved unsupportive of COP26 plans to strengthen 2030 targets at next
year's summit in Egypt.
CAT writes: "GHG emissions in Australia have dipped due to a range of factors, but effective climate policy is not one of them."
Brazil
Although Brazil's Bolsonaro missed the COP26 summit, South America's largest country pledged to reduce methane emissions and, most notably, end illegal deforestation by 2030MaRabelo/Getty Images
Although Brazil's President Jair Bolsonaro
missed the COP26 summit, South America's largest country pledged to
reduce methane emissions and, most notably, end illegal deforestation by
2030.
However, CAT is still critical of Brazil, writing: "There
are significant gaps in Brazilian policymaking for halting emissions
growth, and Brazil's deforestation remains a serious cause for concern."
Canada
Canada has borne the brunt of climate impacts, from brutal heat waves to devastating forest firesChristopher Knox Photography/Getty Images
Canada has often borne the brunt of climate change, from brutal heat waves to devastating forest fires.
But
while describing recent climate policy developments as "positive," CAT
deems these to be "insufficient" to address the climate crisis.
The
analysts add: "If fully implemented, Canada's current policies are not
enough to achieve this target and are only in line with 4C warming.
Canada is also not meeting its fair-share contributions to climate
change and in addition to strengthening its targets and policies also
needs to provide additional support to others."
China
City in the fog, China's Guangzhousuperjoseph/Getty Images
An agreement between China and the U.S., the
world's two biggest carbon polluters, to boost climate cooperation over
the next 10 years, was one of the most striking headlines from the COP26
climate summit.
Ahead of the summit, China officially submitted its carbon neutrality "before 2060" target.
However,
CAT notes there is still space to accelerate China's green revolution,
writing: "To improve on its rating and become compatible with 2C
('Almost sufficient'), China would need to peak emissions as early as
possible, and decrease coal and other fossil fuel consumption at a much
faster rate than currently planned —and set clear phase-out timelines."
Colombia
Colombia has previously announced reducing emissions from deforestation is a vital part of its climate actionArturo Rosenow/Getty Images
The South American country with a population of
almost 51 million people has previously said reducing emissions from
deforestation is a vital part of its planned climate action.
However, while Colombia does have mitigation targets for energy and transport, CAT states that "further action is needed."
India
The banks of Yamuna River polluted with garbage and beautiful Taj Mahal in the backgroundModernNomads/Getty Images
Political pressure exerted by India and China
reportedly resulted final COP26 deal promising only to "phase down"
instead of "phase out" coal.
However, CAT notes the difficulties
of still developing countries such as India to meet the commitments of
its wealthier neighbors, writing: "India has been severely impacted by
COVID 19 during the second wave in the first half of 2021, which has
further reduced the resilience of climate change vulnerable populations
already at risk of displacement by storms, floods, droughts and other
climate disasters."
Indonesia
Following COP26, Indonesia introduced new rules on carbon trading to introduce a market mechanism to achieve the southeast Asian country's greenhouse gas reduction targets by 2030Koldunov/Getty Images
Following COP26, Indonesia introduced new rules
on carbon trading to introduce a market mechanism to achieve the
southeast Asian country's greenhouse gas reduction targets by 2030.
However, the CAT analysis suggests emissions will still "continue to accelerate away from Paris compatible levels."
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan has been rated "highly insufficient" by CAT as its "climate policies and commitments are not consistent with any interpretation of a fair-share contribution and lead to rising, rather than falling, emissions."Sergey Panikhin/Getty Images
The Central Asian, former Soviet state has been
rated "highly insufficient" by CAT, which argues that its "climate
policies and commitments are not consistent with any interpretation of a
fair-share contribution and lead to rising, rather than falling,
emissions."
This forecast is despite Kazakhstan's falling fossil fuel production due to the pandemic.
Mexico
A shot of the Mexico City landscape engulfed in smog, a continuing concern for Mexico’s citizensE_Rojas/Getty Images
CAT rates Mexico's climate targets and policies "highly insufficient," but with one exception.
Mexico's conditional Nationally Determined Contributions target, "roughly stabilises emissions at today's level," it states.
During
the pandemic, the Mexican Ministry of Energy published a bill
effectively halting private renewable energy investment in the country,
prioritising the government's own ageing, fossil fuel-fired power
plants.
New Zealand
Although New Zealand is in the minority of countries with a net-zero emissions 2050 target goal enshrined in law, with its Zero Carbon Act, its short-term policies are thought unable to keep track with this ambitiondarrensp/Getty Image
New Zealand has a net-zero emissions 2050
target goal enshrined in law, but its short-term policies are considered
by CAT to be unable to keep track.
CAT writes: "New Zealand is
increasingly relying on the mitigation potential of the land use and
forestry sector to meet its target rather than focusing efforts on
reducing emissions from high emitting sectors."
Saudi Arabia
Despite perceived improvements in Saudi Arabia’s commitment to climate action, CAT declares on its site these "commitments do not resolve concerns about its role as one of the world’s leading fossil fuel exporters."the.epic.man/Getty Images
Despite perceived improvements in Saudi
Arabia's commitment to climate action, CAT declares on its site that
these "commitments do not resolve concerns about its role as one of the
world's leading fossil fuel exporters."
CAT writes of the Middle
Eastern Country: "Its updated Paris Agreement pledge is explicitly based
on a scenario with substantial fossil fuel exports and has a "get out
clause" if international climate change policies negatively affect these
exports.
"Shortly before the Saudi government released its
updated emissions pledge, the national oil company Saudi Aramco
announced it would aim to increase oil production capacity during this
decade."
South Korea
Although there are positive signs of progress in the East Asian nation, CAT believes South Korea "lacks the necessary speed and stringency it needs to get onto a pathway compatible with the Paris Agreement’s 1.5C temperature limit."Olezzo/Getty Images
Although there are positive signs of progress
in the East Asian nation, CAT believes South Korea "lacks the necessary
speed and stringency it needs to get onto a pathway compatible with the
Paris Agreement's 1.5C temperature limit."
This is despite the
fact South Korea's 2020 share of coal-fired power generation decreased
from 43 percent to 39 percent, as fossil fuels still account for a "very
large" amount, thought to be more than two-thirds of the supply.
United Arab Emirates
An unidentified person walking on a deserted road covered by sand dunes with the Dubai Skyline in the background. Dubai, United Arab EmiratesTravel Wild/Getty Images
The U.A.E's development of large renewable and
nuclear energy projects shows signs of hope, but the Middle Eastern
state's emissions are projected to continue growing because of the
continued expansion of its fossil fuel-based sources of electricity.
CAT
writes on its site: "In line with its energy strategy, which projects
coal reaching a 12 percent share of total electricity generation in
2050, in May 2020 the UAE completed the first unit of its inaugural 2.4
GW coal-fired power plant.
"The construction of new coal-fired
generation is inconsistent with the need to phase out coal from
electricity production in the Middle East by 2034 in order to limit
warming to 1.5C."
Ukraine
Environmental forecasts for Ukraine have painted a slight bleaker prognosis for Ukraine, as emissions were projected to be one percent higher than their pre-COVID-19 estimationsInside Creative House/Getty Images
Environmental forecasts for the country have
painted a slight bleaker prognosis for Ukraine, with emissions projected
to be 1 percent higher than pre-COVID-19 estimations.
This is despite the Ukrainian government approving its Economic Stimulus Program to help stabilise the economy in May 2020.
This picture taken on November 4, 2021 shows steam rising from
cooling towers of the power generating plants in the town of
Singleton, some 70km (43 miles) from Newcastle, the world’s largest
coal exporting port. Saeed Khan | AFP | Getty Images
But he added that he would not legislate the goal and instead would rely on
consumers and companies to drive reductions in emissions.
It was the kind of half measure that climate activists worried would carry over
to the
COP26 summit, the recent United Nations climate talks in Glasgow. They said it did.
“Australia’s ambition for COP26 was to get away with it. To do as little as
possible,” said
Richie Merzian, who previously spent a decade as an Australian government COP negotiator and
now works as the climate and energy program director at The Australia Institute,
an independent public policy think tank.
Fondly known as the sunburned country due to its vast stretches of dry and
barren terrain, Australia has long been under fire as one of the world’s top
producers of coal and gas, and narrowly dodged being labeled the summit’s
villain.
While the country remains a
key U.S. ally amid tensions with China, it has done little in recent years to suggest it will be a leading partner in
the fight against climate catastrophe, despite its pride in its abundant native
wildlife and numerous environmental treasures. Its actions at the climate
conference did little to assuage environmentalists’ concerns.
Critics say Australia’s net zero announcement was a hollow promise and that the
country’s attendance at the
global summit
only showed that the current conservative government is more wedded to fossil
fuel interests than tackling climate change in any substantive way.
“They wanted to neutralize the critique that they aren’t doing anything on
climate” by showing up but did little beyond that, Merzian said in a phone
interview from Glasgow during the closing days of the summit.
David Ritter, CEO of Greenpeace Australia Pacific, was also scathing in his
criticism of how Australia fared at the climate summit.
“The position the Morrison government took to Glasgow was an embarrassment,
deeply inadequate, and wildly insufficient as the climate crisis accelerates in
front of our eyes,” he said in an email from Sydney after the summit.
NBC News reached out to Morrison’s office for comment and was referred to public
comments by Angus Taylor, the minister for industry, energy and emissions
reduction.
“Under our Plan to achieve net zero emissions by 2050, we will act in a
practical, responsible way to reduce emissions and build on our track record of
achievement — reducing emissions while growing our economy, maintaining
affordable, reliable energy and ensuring our regions remain strong. That’s the
Australian way,” Taylor
said in a joint statement
with Marise Payne, the minister for foreign affairs, after the climate summit.
Mining has been a major driving force in Australia’s economy since it was a
British colony in the early 1800s, but coal production truly expanded after
World War II and the industry is still a major employer in many rural
communities.
The country is one of the world’s largest emitters of
greenhouse gases
on a per capita basis and ranks as the world’s third largest fossil fuel
exporter, behind only
Russia
and
Saudi Arabia.
Australia needs ‘national leadership’ to drive climate action: Climate
Council
Coal power then became a major point of contention in the closing hours of the
conference, when delegates from China and India
insisted on watering down the final language
of the COP26 deal and replacing a commitment to “phase out” coal with the term
“phase down.”
And despite
British Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s assertion that Glasgow had effectively sounded “the death knell for coal
power,” Morrison reiterated his country’s commitment in the wake of the summit,
saying the coal industry will be working in Australia for “decades to come.”
Australia’s lack of action on the issue sets a bad example for other countries,
Merzian said, “instead of driving ambition like the
U.S.
and the
U.K.”
“They are giving cover to other laggards like Russia and
Turkey
because they can look at Australia and say, ‘Look, if a wealthy industrialized
country like Australia isn’t doing more in the short term, why should I?’” he
said.
Morrison has long been caught in a political bind over climate change.
His government’s coalition partner, the National Party, is a strong supporter of
the coal industry and made multiple attempts to block the net zero target,
citing potential risks to the country’s economy.
Morrison is a well-known proponent of the industry himself. He famously brought
a
lump of coal into the Australian Parliament
in 2017 and, with a showman’s flair, praised its value during a debate on
renewable energy.
“Sadly, historically, Australia’s climate policy, to some extent, has been
dictated by the position of incumbent interests in the oil, gas and coal
industry” and that is why it has lagged behind it’s global peers, Christian
Downie, an associate professor at the Australian National University who
specializes in energy and climate politics, said ahead of the conference.
At the same time, the country has felt the impact of
climate change
and that has helped increase pressure from some voters for more decisive action.
Sixty percent of respondents said “global warming is a serious and pressing
problem” that should be addressed now “even if it involves significant costs,”
according to a
May 2021 poll by the Lowy Institute, an independent think tank in Australia.
A young male koala named ‘Jan’ is seen in a outdoor koala pen at
Port Macquarie Koala Hospital on September 14, 2020, in Port
Macquarie, Australia. Lisa Maree Williams | Getty Images
And the
Great Barrier Reef, the world’s most extensive coral reef ecosystem, has suffered so much from
warming sea temperatures that it lost half its corals in just 20 years.
Yet, Australia ranked last out of 60 countries for its policy response to the
climate crisis in one assessment released at the COP26 summit.
“The country’s lack of domestic ambition and action has made its way to the
international stage,” the Climate Change Performance Index
report said. “Australia has fallen behind its allies.”
A spokesperson for Taylor, the minister for energy and emissions reduction, said
that the Australian government “rejects” the report’s “subjective” findings
“because it clearly ignores key facts and statistics.”
Environmental activists have reacted angrily to the lack of action in Glasgow.
Two young climate protesters disrupted operations at the world’s largest coal
port in Newcastle, Australia, on Nov. 17 by abseiling off the huge machinery and
declaring in a video livestream: “This is us responding to the climate crisis.”
To Ritter, from Greenpeace Australia, it’s past time for the country to step up
on the world stage.
“Australia’s reckless climate obstruction is as brazen as it is appalling,” he
said. “A betrayal of our trust and a betrayal of our future.”
