10/02/2022

(AU New Daily) ‘Guilty Of Greenwashing’: Major Electricity Retailers Panned In Climate Rankings

New Daily -
Greenpeace has named and shamed Australia's dirtiest electricity retailers. Photo: AAP Matthew Elmas

Australians looking for greener electricity are being urged to ditch major retailers after new research found that most households are buying power from the dirtiest companies.

Greenpeace released its 2022 green power rankings on Tuesday, pitting 48 Australian electricity retailers against each other on their response to the climate crisis and how much of their energy comes from fossil fuels.

The results revealed a stark difference between Australia’s three largest power retailers – AGL, Origin and Energy Australia – and small retailers, with the major providers dominating the bottom of the Greenpeace rankings.

AGL, Australia’s largest generator and retailer of electricity, scored a one out of 10 (ranked last), with 83 per cent of its energy coming from coal.

In contrast, independent Enova Energy was ranked first and given a 10 out of 10 score, with 100 per cent of its electricity being sourced from renewables.

Greenpeace senior campaigner Glenn Walker was the lead author of the report and said the prevalence of big retailers at the bottom of the list showed that consumers have the power to change the market by switching providers.

Most Australians are buying power from the big three providers, he said.

“Australia’s largest electricity retailers are also Australia’s biggest climate polluters,” Mr Walker said.

“It only takes a few minutes to switch electricity providers.”


Greenpeace surveyed retailers and used publicly available information from market regulators and the stock exchange to prepare the report.

The charity reviewed where retailers get their power and whether they support fossil fuel subsidies to determine their green credentials.

Mr Walker said it was a necessary job because the big retailers present themselves as climate-friendly in their advertising, only to continue burning fossil fuels and backing policies that support coal and gas.

A quick look at AGL Australia’s YouTube channel shows it is packed with ads about wind farms, electric vehicles and other renewable projects.

But despite this marketing, AGL has confirmed it plans to burn coal until 2048.

“The big retailers are guilty of greenwashing,” Mr Walker said.

“They promote themselves through wind farms and solar energy, but in reality most of their energy comes from dirty coal.”

Switching retailers is easier than you think

Thankfully, switching energy retailers is easier than you might think.

It usually only takes a few minutes and your lights shouldn’t switch off.


The first step is to contact the retailer you want to switch to and ask for its best deal.

Have the offer you are interested in and any concession you are eligible for close to hand. This will help you get the right electricity plan.

It’s a good idea to ask about the electricity price per kilowatt hour and if there are any fees or other conditions in your contract before signing.

Once you have signed up, your new retailer will start using your existing smart meter data so your power shouldn’t switch off, even for a second.

Your next bill will come from your new retailer rather than your old one.

One thing to watch out for is whether your existing retailer has any exit fees or other conditions that might make it costly to cancel your deal.

If you need to make a complaint or have any questions about regulatory protections for consumers switching providers, the best point of contact is your state- or territory-based energy and water ombudsman’s office.

Just google “electricity ombudsman” followed by your state or territory.

Links

(USA NBC) Date Set For First Youth-Led Climate Trial In U.S. History

NBC - Lucas Thompson

In Held v. State of Montana, 16 youth plaintiffs have sued the state over its energy policy, alleging that fossil fuel development accelerates climate change.

Firefighters watch a hillside burn on the Northern Cheyenne Indian Reservation on Aug 11, 2021, near Lame Deer, Mont., as the Richard Spring fire was threatening hundreds of homes. Matthew Brown / AP file

For the first time in U.S. history, a youth-led climate change lawsuit will go to trial. 

In Held v. State of Montana, 16 youth plaintiffs have sued the state over its energy policy, alleging that its heavy dependence on fossil fuel development accelerates climate change and infringes on their constitutional right to a clean and healthful environment.

The trial will start Feb. 6, 2023, according to documents obtained by NBC News.

The complaint was filed in March 2020. In August 2021, a judge denied the state’s move to dismiss it, allowing it to move to trial — the first lawsuit of its kind in the United States.

“Children are uniquely vulnerable to the consequences of the climate crisis, which harms Youth Plaintiffs’ physical and psychological health and safety, interferes with family and cultural foundations and integrity, and causes economic deprivations,” the complaint states.

Montana is one of six states that mention environmental rights in its state constitution. Article IX, added in 1972, reads: “The state and each person shall maintain and improve a clean and healthful environment in Montana for present and future generations.”

Globally, lawsuits around climate change are becoming more frequent. A database kept by the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law at Columbia Law School now includes case documents for more than 1,000 climate change lawsuits from around the world.

A federal judge in Australia ruled last May that the government had a “duty of care” for young people when making decisions involving climate change. But the group of teenage climate change activists lost its fight against the expansion of a coal mine.

Climate experts worry warming temperatures could impact future Winter Games 3min 38sec

In the U.S., however, such lawsuits remain rare. One, Juliana v. United States, was filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon in 2015 and included allegations similar to those in Held v. Montana, but that case has not yet been given a trial date. 

“One way that people respond when other systems fail, when politics fail, governments fail, corporate governance fails is they go to court to try and seek redress,” said Michael Burger, executive director of the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law.

Though the Montana trial is not set to start for another year, Burger said its outcome would be “highly significant.”

But he cautioned that a trial alone does not effect change.

“The fact that they’re going to trial doesn’t mean that the plaintiffs have won,” he said. “One of the things that the plaintiffs have to prove is that these government policies and statutes are a substantial cause of their injury. And that may have some interesting twists and turns.”

Rikki Held. Courtesy Rikki Held

Rikki Held, 20, the only named plaintiff in the suit, said: “It’s been a long time coming. … Having the courts actually going through … the actual scientific evidence, the best evidence we have so far, to help us protect our constitutional rights … protect the homes we love and the people we care about.”

Nate Bellinger, co-counsel for the youth plaintiffs and a senior staff attorney with Our Children’s Trust, a nonprofit law firm that focuses on young people’s right to a safe climate, said: “We have an opportunity to go into open court before a judge, before the public, and tell this story from beginning to end. 

“How the state of Montana is permitting fossil fuels, how those fossil fuels are causing and contributing to climate change, how climate change is harming the 16 youth plaintiffs in really specific and individualized ways,” he said.

A representative for the state of Montana did not return a request for comment.

Last year, every county in Montana experienced some level of drought, and the state had a particularly active year for wildfires. Fires burned the fifth largest amount of acreage since 1980. Held pointed to them as examples of how climate change has continued to wreak havoc on their lives since the complaint was filed almost two years ago.

“Those played a big role in my family and our businesses,” Held said. “The roads were closed. … August was our peak season … with hunting season. And we lost, like, half our revenue, just because of road closures.”

Held said the heat and wildfires also directly affected her health. She said she experienced headaches from the smoke, and heat exhaustion, while working outside on her family’s 7,000-acre ranch.

“It’s really real and frightening,” she said. “It’s kind of frustrating that we’re not doing as much as we should.”

The trial court said it could not issue an injunction against the government of Montana, nor order what it should do. The court said, however, that it would still rule if the state is violating the plaintiffs’ constitutional rights.

“To have a state court determine that the failure to consider climate change under a state’s environmental impact assessment law, is unconstitutional … that’s a big deal,” Burger said.

Kian Tanner. Courtesy Kian Tanner

A ruling in the case could set significant legal precedent that other states or countries could cite.

“I feel that it is monumentous,” said Kian Tanner, another plaintiff in the case who was 14 when it was filed.

Both Held and Tanner said they hoped this case would put a spotlight on what it means to be a young person during the fight against climate change, and what it means to protect future generations.

“Our governments … they should serve us,” Held said. “If people are being hurt by supporting a fossil fuel system, then I just don’t see why you wouldn’t want to change and, you know, help the people of your state.”

Links

(AU Canberra Times) Local Councils Are Leading On Climate Resilience

Canberra Times - Portia Odell

Nillumbik Shire Council installed an off-grid solar and battery system on the roof of a local stadium/emergency shelter. Picture: Supplied

Author
Dr Portia Odell is director of the Cities Power Partnership, Australia's largest network of local councils working toward a zero-emissions future.
Have you noticed more intense and frequent extreme weather this summer? I have.

A friend and her family were forced to flee to their pool when their house was engulfed in a bushfire in regional Western Australia; the campground I was at in Wye River, Victoria flooded for the second year in a row when the river burst its banks because of heavy rainfall in the hills; friends in Queensland have suffered through brutally intense storms.

I'm sure you have your own stories, too. Wild weather events are affecting each one of us, and we can expect that to continue as climate change exacerbates extreme weather like heatwaves, drought, flooding, bushfires and cyclones.

Fortunately, many local councils are working to curb the worst impacts of climate change by cutting greenhouse gas emissions and rolling out initiatives to protect their communities.

From coast to coast and in between, there are plenty of examples of councils acting to mitigate and adapt to the impacts of climate change.

In Victoria, Nillumbik Shire's Hybrid Solar and Battery Off-Grid Stadium and Relief Centre can operate as an emergency shelter, playing a critical role as a safe place for the community during heatwaves, bushfires and storms.

The solar and battery system can provide off-grid power for up to eight hours during an emergency. On an average day, the system helps cut emissions and costs by reducing grid-sourced electricity by 80 per cent.

You may also have heard about (or been in one of) the many communities in NSW inundated by flooding at the end of 2021.

Lake Macquarie Council is home to one of the most exposed estuaries in the nation, with hundreds of houses susceptible to flooding. The council has a long history of flood management, most recently adopting local adaptation plans for the region's townships.

To inform residents about expected flooding and when evacuation is necessary, the council promoted the Flood and Coastal Intelligence tool, which helps to improve emergency literacy and provide critical advanced emergency advice.

On the other side of the country, West Australians have been feeling the heat and threat of bushfires. As the former mayor of Fremantle, Brad Pettit, wrote recently, "Perth has sweltered through so many hot days this summer that any day under 40 degrees almost feels like light relief."

Further south, the Shire of Augusta Margaret River had a devastating start to the summer, with 7800 hectares of iconic forest burnt. To protect the region, their council created a plan to support the recovery and ongoing management of Boranup Forest and the Leeuwin Naturaliste National Park.

This targeted plan, along with long-term strategies to achieve net zero emissions by 2030, puts Augusta Margaret River Shire in a leadership role when it comes to acting to protect its community from climate impacts.

South Australians have faced both heavy rain and oppressive heat. To address these climate impacts, Alexandrina Council's A2040 Strategic Community Plan identifies tree canopy and urban greening as one of five key actions to achieve their livability aspirations.

Alexandrina has also begun a canopy baseline study of urban trees to increase the cooling and anti-erosion effects of plants, taking urban greening to the next level.

These are just a few of the many examples of how local councils are mitigating and planning for climate impacts to safeguard their communities. But while councils are already punching above their weight on climate action, they can't do it alone.

A report, Neighbourhood Issue: Climate costs and risks to councils, prepared by the Climate Council and Cities Power Partnership, revealed that more support and funding is needed to support local councils to prepare for and cope with the impacts of climate change.

Ensuring the long-term economic security and resilience of our communities means state, territory and federal governments must put resources, actions and policies in place that protect them.

With the right support, our cities and towns can create the safe and liveable communities we all deserve.

Links

09/02/2022

(Carbon Brief) Analysis: What The New IPCC Report Says About When World May Pass 1.5C And 2C

Carbon Brief - Zeke Hausfather

View of planet Earth from space. Credit: Buradaki / Alamy Stock Photo

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) sixth assessment report (AR6) is the first major IPCC review to specifically focus on when the world might pass the 1.5C and 2C warming levels. 

AR6 uses a combination of historical observations, climate models and an updated estimate of climate sensitivity to provide a best-estimate that the world will pass – or temporarily “reach” – 1.5C somewhere between 2030 and 2035, depending on the future emissions scenario. 

Even in the most stringent mitigation scenario examined in the report – SSP1-1.9 – the world exceeds 1.5C in most models during the middle of the 21st century, before falling back down below 1.5C by 2100 due to the large-scale deployment of negative emissions technologies (for more details on the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) used in the AR6, read Carbon Brief’s explainer). 
The date that the world is expected to pass 1.5C is in “the early part of the range” suggested in Chapter 1 of the IPCC’s 2018 special report on 1.5C (SR15), due to a combination of revisions to historical temperature records and higher near-term warming projections.

However, a separate, more directly comparable estimate found in Chapter 2 of the SR15 report is nearly identical to the new AR6 estimates.

The world is expected to pass 2C in emissions scenarios that do not feature strong near-term mitigation with a best-estimate of between the early 2040s and the early 2050s. These – and the 1.5C exceedance dates – are quite similar to those given in an earlier Carbon Brief analysis published in late 2020.

AR6 has also updated the remaining “carbon budget” that can be emitted before the world is committed to 1.5C or 2C of warming. 

The carbon budget for a 50% chance to limit warming to 1.5C is quite similar to that given in the SR15 report. It shows that the world can emit around 460bn tonnes of CO2 (GtCO2) – or just 11.5 years of current (2020) emissions – after 1 January 2021 before being committed to 1.5C. 

The carbon budgets for limiting warming to 1.5C with a 66% chance has been slightly increased due to the narrower range of climate sensitivity in the AR6. The remaining carbon budget to limit warming to 2C is similarly affected.

In addition, the report introduces new carbon budgets for limiting warming to 1.7C, as well as for limiting to each temperature with higher (83%) or lower (17%) probability.

The narrower range of future projected warming in the AR6 compared to past IPCC reports – coupled with more historical observations over the past few years – provides a better sense of when these important warming levels may be exceeded.

When will the world pass 1.5C?

AR6 focuses in some depth on when the world might pass 1.5C and 2C warming levels relative to the pre-industrial period. The authors suggest that the world is likely to pass 1.5C in the early 2030s, in the absence of rapid emissions mitigation. This is in the earliest part of the 2030-52 range reported in the SR15 summary for policymakers (SPM).

The 1.5C and 2C warming levels are noteworthy in part because they reflect the targets set in the Paris Agreement.

However, Paris targets specifically refer to end-of-century warming outcomes, so scenarios such as SSP1-1.9 – which overshoot 1.5C mid-century before reducing temperatures back down through a large-scale deployment of negative emissions – are nominally consistent with Paris goals, even if they may exceed 1.5C during the 21st century.

(See Carbon Brief’s Q&A on the IPCC report for an introduction to the scenarios used by the IPCC, or Carbon Brief’s explainer for more details.)

Calculating when the world exceeds a particular temperature threshold is not a straightforward exercise. Global average surface temperatures in any given year are driven by a combination of long-term warming and short-term natural variability.

The latter – driven by El Niño and La Niña events or volcanic eruptions – can result in a year being up to 0.2C warmer or cooler than the trajectory of long-term human-caused warming.

This means it is quite possible for humans to have only warmed the world by 1.3C – only slightly above today’s level – and see a single year that exceeds 1.5C. In fact, the World Meteorological Organization estimated last year that there is a one-in-four chance that the world will exceed 1.5C for at least one year by 2025.

The international community of researchers and policymakers is more concerned with the effects of long-term human-caused warming than short-term natural variability. Because of this, passing the 1.5C and 2C limits has generally been defined based on a multi-year average rather than a single year, though there is no clear agreed-upon approach. 

To avoid the problem of over-interpreting short-term variability, the AR6 authors calculate the 20-year periods where the average temperature reaches 1.5C (or 2C) warming above pre-industrial levels

For example, in the SSP2-4.5 scenario, they find that 2021-40 is the first 20-year period when the average is most likely to exceed 1.5C.

This formulation is a bit confusing – in order to simplify it (and compare it to other approaches) Carbon Brief uses the mid-point of the 20-year period (for example, 2030 in the case of a 2021-40) as the likely point at which the longer-term average temperature exceeds 1.5C, following the approach used in Chapter 4 of the AR6.

This generally provides a good estimate of the likely exceedance year, though may be slightly off in cases where the rate of warming changes significantly over the course of the 20-year period (for example, in very high emissions scenarios). 

Both the SR15 report and a 2020 analysis by Carbon Brief used a somewhat different approach; rather than looking at 20-year averages, these methods smoothed the data to remove short-term temperature variability before calculating the likely exceedance year.

Carbon Brief used the new CMIP6 models, while the SR15 Chapter 1 assessment simply extrapolated historical warming trends and uncertainties into the future. AR6, on the other hand, uses its own assessed warming range based on CMIP6 models constrained by both observations and climate sensitivity estimates. 

The SR15 report actually included two separate assessments of when the world might pass 1.5C. Chapter 1 of the report suggested that the world would pass 1.5C somewhere between 2030 and 2052, adding that there was stronger evidence to support the early part of this range.

The Chapter 1 text did not give a central estimate, but did include a figure, showing the world passing 1.5C around 2040. This was based on an assumed continuation of the (at the time) historical warming trend of 0.2C per decade. 

However, this value underestimates both recent observed warming trends (in part due to corrections to observational temperature records in the years since the publication of the SR15) and is lower than the near-term warming projections in most of scenarios evaluated in the SR15 report (and those in the new AR6). 

In addition, deep in the supplementary materials of Chapter 2 of the SR15 report was an estimate (in Table 2. SM.12) that a 1.5C low overshoot scenario (similar to the SSP1-1.9 scenarios) would pass 1.5C around 2035.

It suggested that well-below 2C scenarios (similar to SSP2-2.6) would pass 1.5C around 2033. These values are nearly identical to the best estimates in the new IPCC report, though because they were not highlighted in the main text, this was not widely understood at the time.

The figure below shows the main SR15 projection of 1.5C exceedance times (grey bar), along with the new AR6 likely exceedance year (and uncertainty ranges) for each of the new SSP scenarios. In addition, Carbon Brief’s estimates of when the world might pass 1.5C are shown alongside the new IPCC projections for comparison purposes.

Range of possible 1.5C exceedance years from Chapter 1 and Chapter 2 of the IPCC SR15 report (grey bar and dots, respectively), as well as AR6 and Carbon Brief exceedance year estimates for each of the SSPs. Dots represent central estimates (when available), while bars represent the very likely (5–95%) range. 20-year average periods in the AR6 are converted to expected exceedance years by taking the midpoint of the range. Note that bars extending to the top of the graph represent cases where the uncertainty range encompases outcomes that never exceed 1.5C. Chart by Carbon Brief using Highcharts.

The new AR6 values are notably in the earliest part of the range given by SR15 Chapter 1. The AR6 estimates that the world will pass 1.5C around 2030 under a moderate emissions scenario (SSP2-4.5), whereas SR15 gave a range of 2030-52. 

However, as mentioned above, the AR6 numbers are in line with those in the SR15 Chapter 2 supplementary materials.

More broadly, the AR6 finds a best-estimate exceedance year of 2027-35 across all of the models examined, albeit with a wide uncertainty range for each. In scenarios without rapid mitigation, the world is very likely to exceed 1.5C in the late 2030s (SSP5-8.5) or mid-2040s (SSP2-4.5) at the latest.

The new AR6 central estimates of when the world will likely pass 1.5C are generally quite similar to Carbon Brief’s 2020 analysis, though are, on balance, a few years earlier. More importantly, the uncertainty range in the AR6 is considerably larger, suggesting that the long-term average temperature may pass 1.5C as early as 2020 or 2021.

However, passing 1.5C this early is a very unlikely outcome given observed temperatures today. These early potential exceedance dates are likely something of an artifact of model-observation mismatches after the 1995-2014 normalisation periods – where models and observations are matched in the AR6.

Carbon Brief’s earlier analysis, by contrast, used model projections from 2020 onwards based on a best-estimate of the human contribution to warming.

Crossing 2C

In addition to 1.5C exceedance years, the AR6 report provides estimates of when the world may pass 2C warming relative to pre-industrial levels. These are shown for each SSP scenario expected to pass 2C in the figure below, alongside Carbon Brief’s own estimates. Note that SSP1-1.9 and SSP2-2.6 are excluded as temperatures are unlikely to exceed 2C in most models under these scenarios.

Range of possible 2C exceedance years in the AR6 and Carbon Brief’s 2020 analysis. Dots represent central estimates (when available), while bars represent the very likely (5–95%) range. 20-year average periods in the AR6 are converted to expected exceedance years by taking the midpoint of the range. Chart by Carbon Brief using Highcharts.

AR6 finds that in the modest-mitigation SSP2-4.5 scenario the world is likely to exceed 2C around 2052, with a range of 2037 to 2084. For the high emissions SSP3-7.0 scenario, the world is likely to pass 2C around 2046 (with a range of 2035-2062), while in the very high emissions SSP5-8.5 scenario it is 2041 (with a range of 2032 to 2053).

These values are effectively identical to Carbon Brief’s earlier estimates, except for a wider range of possible later exceedance dates in SSP2-4.5 and SSP3-7.0. This may reflect differences between the unweighted CMIP6 models used by Carbon Brief and the assessed warming range in the AR6.

The results of the new AR6 report are clear: the best estimate is that the world will pass 1.5C in the 2030s, even under the rapid mitigation scenarios of SSP1-1.9 and SSP1-2.6.

However, there is still a chance in these scenarios that the world will not pass 1.5C, particularly under the SSP1-1.9 scenario and if sensitivity of the climate to CO2 and other greenhouse gas emissions is on the low end of the range assessed in the AR6 report.

In the SSP1-1.9 scenario, the best estimate is that the world will overshoot 1.5C in the middle of the 21st century – warming by 1.6C relative to pre-industrial levels – before temperatures fall back down to below 1.5C by 2100 through the widespread use of negative emissions technologies.

The world is unlikely to warm more than 2C in either of the deep mitigation scenarios. In the other three scenarios examined, however, the best estimate is that the world will pass 2C somewhere between the early 2040s and early 2050s.

Updates to the remaining carbon budget

The year in which the world will exceed 1.5C and 2C warming levels is a related, but somewhat separate, question from the remaining carbon budget. 

Carbon budgets are a simplified way to measure the maximum emissions that can still enter the atmosphere if the world wishes to limit global warming to levels such as 1.5C. They are based on the fact that the amount of warming that will occur can be approximated by total – that is, cumulative – CO2 emissions.

In practice, though, carbon budgets mask a lot of complexity. Because the world is already most of the way to 1.5C of warming, the remaining budget is relatively small and, therefore, quite sensitive to the approach used.

The 2018 SR15 report significantly expanded the carbon budget, relative to what was reported in the IPCC fifth assessment report (AR5) in 2013-14. This was primarily due to the use of observations rather than climate model projections to estimate historical warming; for more technical details see this Carbon Brief analysis.

AR6 used a broadly similar approach to that of the SR15 (Chapter 2) to calculate the remaining budget and generally obtained similar results. The figure below shows the remaining carbon budgets for both a 50% chance and a 66% chance of avoiding more than 1.5C warming above pre-industrial levels from the SR15 and the AR6, as of 1 January 2021. 

These are calculated by subtracting observed global emissions (as reported by the Global Carbon Project) over the 2018-20 period from the SR15 budget (which gives the remaining allowable budget starting in 2018) and by subtracting observed 2020 emissions from the AR6 budget (which provides a budget starting in 2020).

Remaining carbon budgets for a 50% and 66% chance of avoiding more than 1.5C warming as of January 1st 2021. Published budgets have been adjusted using observed CO2 emissions from the Global Carbon Project. Chart by Carbon Brief using Highcharts.

Both the SR15 and AR6 suggest that the world has around 460GtCO2 remaining in the 1.5C budget for a 50% avoidance chance. This means that the remaining carbon budget would be fully exhausted in just 11.5 years of current (2020) emissions – and less than that if global emissions rebound (as expected) in 2021 and do not decrease over the next decade.

For example, the carbon budget would be used up in 10.7 years if emissions continued at 2019 levels. This would result in a world committed to a 1.5C temperature increase around 2031 – quite similar to the best estimate exceedance dates found in the AR6 discussed above.

For a 66% chance of limiting warming to 1.5C, AR6 reports that the world has a remaining carbon budget of 360GtCO2 – or nine years of current emissions. 

This is a notable increase from the SR15 carbon budget of 295GtCO2. This increased carbon budget for a 66% avoidance chance reflects a narrower transient climate response to cumulative carbon emissions (TCRE) value calculated in the AR6 report (1C to 2.3C per 1000 gigatons of carbon – GtC) than in the SR15 (0.8C to 2.5C per 1,000GtC), resulting from the narrower estimate of climate sensitivity in the AR6.

This TCRE revision does not affect the 50% avoidance chance as the best-estimate of TCRE is unchanged at 1.65C per 1,000GtC.
Methodological changes

A number of other important elements were updated in the AR6 carbon budget calculations. 

First, updated temperature records were used that moved the world a bit closer to 1.5C than was assumed in the SR15 report, which, all things being equal, would result in a lower carbon budget. However, in the SR15 report the global surface air temperature (GSAT) was assumed to be warming faster than the global mean surface temperature (GMST), resulting in a smaller carbon budget.

(GMST is the standard metric used when discussing historical, observation-based recordings. It is based on a combination of land-surface air temperatures from weather stations and the sea surface temperature, measured using buoys and ships.

It is subtly different from GSAT, which is generally used by climate models. It is also based on land surface air temperatures, but this is combined with temperatures of the air above seawater, rather than of the seawater itself.)

AR6 – based on more recent studies – found more limited evidence for this assumption, and did not assume any difference between GSAT and GMST. This change largely counterbalanced the reduction in the carbon budget associated with updated temperature records, resulting in a 50% avoidance budget nearly identical to that of the SR15.

The SR15 report suggested that unrepresented Earth system feedbacks – such as thawing permafrost – could result in a reduction of remaining carbon budgets of up to 100GtCO2 over the course of this century – and these were not included in the remaining carbon budgets numbers.

The AR6 lowers this estimate of Earth system feedbacks to 26GtCO2 per degree C warming (albeit with an uncertainty of ±97GtCO2) and includes these feedbacks in its carbon budget numbers – while acknowledging that there is still low confidence in the exact magnitude of these estimates.

Carbon budget for 2C

In addition to remaining carbon budgets for 1.5C, both the SR15 and AR6 provide carbon budgets for 2C. These are shown – calculated as starting in 2021 – in the figure below.

Remaining carbon budgets for a 50% and 66% chance of avoiding more than 2C warming as of January 1st 2021. Published budgets have been adjusted using observed CO2 emissions from the Global Carbon Project. Chart by Carbon Brief using Highcharts.

AR6 slightly reduces the remaining carbon budget for a 50% chance of avoiding 2C, relative to that in the SR15 – from 1,375GtCO2 (or 34 years of current emissions) to 1,310GtCO2 (or 33 years of current emissions).

This suggests that the world will exhaust its remaining 2C carbon budget around 2053 if current emissions continue – quite similar to the 2052 exceedance year in the modest mitigation SSP2-4.5 scenario discussed earlier. 

For a 66% chance of avoiding 2C warming – which is how the Paris Agreement goal of limiting warming to well-below 2C is commonly interpreted – AR6 has slightly increased the remaining carbon budget from 1,045GtCO2 (26 years of current emissions) to 1,110GtCO2 (28 years of current emissions). This reflects the updated TCRE values in the AR6 compared to the SR15 report.

Overall, both the exceedance years and carbon budgets reported in the AR6 are similar to values reported in the SR15 report – despite notable updates to the models used for calculating exceedance years and the approach used for calculating carbon budgets.

The AR6 exceedance estimate of around 2030 is in the earliest part of the range reported by Chapter 1 of SR15 but is very similar to the values reported in the supplementary materials of the SR15.

Links

(BBC) Climate Change: Top Companies Exaggerating Their Progress - Study

BBC - Georgina Rannard

Environmentalists often accuse corporations of misleading consumers with greenwashing. Getty Images

Many of the world's biggest companies are failing to meet their own targets on tackling climate change, according to a study of 25 corporations.

They also routinely exaggerate or misreport their progress, the New Climate Institute report says.

Google, Amazon, Ikea, Apple and Nestle are among those failing to change quickly enough, the study alleges.

Corporations are under pressure to cut their environmental impact as more consumers want green products.

Some of the companies told BBC News they disagreed with some of the methods used in the report and said they were committed to taking action to curb climate change.

The firms analysed account for 5% of global greenhouse-gas emissions, the report says - which means although they have a huge carbon footprint, they have enormous potential to lead in the effort to limit climate change.

"The rapid acceleration of corporate climate pledges, combined with the fragmentation of approaches, means that it is more difficult than ever to distinguish between real climate leadership and unsubstantiated," the study says.

Study author Thomas Day told BBC News his team originally wanted to discover good practices in the corporate world, but they were "frankly surprised and disappointed at the overall integrity of the companies' claims".

Amazon said in its statement: "We set these ambitious targets because we know that climate change is a serious problem, and action is needed now more than ever. As part of our goal to reach net-zero carbon by 2040, Amazon is on a path to powering our operations with 100% renewable energy by 2025."

And Nestle commented: "We welcome scrutiny of our actions and commitments on climate change. However, the New Climate Institute's Corporate Climate Responsibility Monitor (CCRM) report lacks understanding of our approach and contains significant inaccuracies."

The Corporate Climate Responsibility Monitor was conducted by non-profit organisations New Climate Institute and Carbon Market Watch.

It looked at firms' publicly stated strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions in order to reach net zero.

Net zero, a target scientists say the world must reach by 2050 to limit global temperature rises, means not adding to the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.

Achieving it means reducing emissions as much as possible, as well as balancing out any that remain by removing an equivalent amount.

Companies set their own targets. For example, Google promises to be carbon-free by 2030, while Ikea pledges to be "climate-positive" by 2030.

Emissions are created by anything from transporting goods, to energy used in factories or shops. The carbon footprint of growing crops or cutting down trees also counts.

The study gave each firm an "integrity" rating. It found that some were doing relatively well in reducing emissions but that all corporations could improve. None was given a rating of "high integrity".

It assessed factors like annually disclosing emissions; giving a breakdown of emission sources; and disclosing information in an understandable way.

 
It concluded that overall, the strategies in place - if implemented - would reduce emissions by 40% at most, not the 100% implied in the term "net zero".

Just three of the 25 companies are clearly committed to removing 90% of carbon emissions from their production and supply chains, it says. Those are Maersk, Vodafone and Deutsche Telekom.

The way that businesses talk about their climate pledges is also a big problem, the study says. There is a large gap between what companies say and the reality, Mr Day says - and consumers are likely to find it difficult to determine the truth.

"Companies' ambitious-sounding headline claims all too often lack real substance," he explains. "Even companies that are doing relatively well exaggerate their actions."

Mr Day, whose team spent weeks poring over documents, said the average person trying, for example, to choose a piece of furniture, technology or buy food in the supermarket would struggle to make an informed decision.

He said one of the most controversial areas was what are known as downstream or upstream emissions - ones that are created by activity indirectly linked to a company.

For example, the report says 70% of Apple's climate footprint is created by upstream emissions, including the consumption of electricity by consumers using Apple phones, laptops and other products.

Many companies did not include these emissions in their climate plans.

Ikea told BBC News it welcomed "dialogue and scrutiny" of companies' climate commitments and goals, to ensure that they were "aligned with the science of 1.5°C".

"The new report by New Climate Institute is a constructive addition to this."

And Unilever commented: "While we share different perspectives on some elements of this report, we welcome external analysis of our progress and have begun a productive dialogue with the New Climate Institute to see how we can meaningfully evolve our approach.

Google told BBC News: "We clearly define the scope of our climate commitments and regularly report on our progress in our annual Environmental Report, where our energy and greenhouse gas emissions data is assured by Ernst & Young."

Apple did not respond directly to the report but told BBC News it has a plan to reduce its carbon footprint.

The Corporate Climate Responsibility Monitor will continue to assess companies' pledges, releasing findings annually.

The full list of companies analysed is: Maersk, Apple, Sony, Vodafone, Amazon, Deutsche Telekom, Enel, GlaxoSmithKline, Google, Hitachi, Ikea, Vale, Volkswagen, Walmart, Accenture, BMW Group, Carrefour, CVS Health, Deutsche Post DHL, E.On SE, JBS, Nestle, Novartis, Saint-Gobain, Unilever.

Links

(AU The Guardian) WA Bushfires Linked To Climate Change As At Least Five Homes Lost

The GuardianAustralian Associated Press

About 1,000 firefighters are managing four blazes which reached emergency risk level in the state’s south

WA bushfires claim at least four homes – video 0.45secs

At least five homes have been lost in Western Australia and 60,000 hectares razed in one of the most challenging bushfire periods in recent memory, and one the state’s fire and emergency services commissioner has linked to climate change.

About 1,000 firefighters are managing four blazes which reached an emergency risk level over the weekend in southern parts of the state.

Emergency warnings for residents in the eastern wheatbelt and south-west town of Bridgetown were downgraded on Monday to watch and act, however authorities warned there was still a possible threat to lives and homes.

WA’s Department of Fire and Emergency Services (DFES) said one home had been lost in Bridgetown, along with sheds, vehicles, fences and equipment.

A further four homes were earlier confirmed as having been lost near Denmark on the south coast.

“I don’t recall a time where we’ve had four level-three bushfires occurring at the same time as well as dealing with a state of emergency around a pandemic,” DFES commissioner Darren Klemm said.

“So it’s particularly challenging from a resourcing point of view.”

The Shackleton fire in the eastern wheatbelt has burned through about 40,000 hectares and at one point spanned 35km long.

Conditions have eased since Sunday, when wind gusts of up 85km/h prevented firefighters from operating large air tankers, but the fire is still not contained.

With Perth having sweltered through its hottest January on record and the Pilbara town of Onslow surpassing 50C to equal the nation’s highest temperature, Klemm said there was no doubt climate change was intensifying bushfire conditions.

He said the Denmark fire, which is now contained, had doubled in size during Friday night, a highly unusual occurrence given the south coast’s cooler climate.

“We’re seeing fires provide us with particularly difficult circumstances where they normally wouldn’t have,” he said.

“That activity of fire at night is becoming more prevalent and equally the fires are becoming more intense.

“People need to understand how challenging that is for the crews on the ground.”

A damage assessment for the Bridgetown fire was completed on Monday but authorities were yet to assess the impact of the Shackleton blaze.

Another fire near the wheatbelt town of Narrogin which also reached emergency level has also been downgraded to watch and act.

Klemm said there were reports of a “pretty significant impact” to large numbers of cattle as well as a piggery east of Narrogin.

Residents in the small railway town of Hester, near Bridgetown, were evacuated over the weekend due to toxic dust and ash being blown by the wind.

Authorities are looking at treatment measures and are yet to determine when residents will be able to return.

Police have deemed the Denmark bushfire to be non-suspicious but arson squad detectives are looking at the Bridgetown blaze. The wheatbelt fires are yet to be investigated.

Klemm said the DFES is looking into reports two firefighters had sustained minor burns, as well as an accident involving two vehicles.

Western Power on Monday said it was working to restore power to about 13,800 customers across the network, most of whom were in the metropolitan region.

About 600 homes in Bridgetown and 400 in Denmark remain without power.

Links

08/02/2022

Bridgetown And Denmark Bushfires: Resident Critical, At Least Five Properties Lost As Blazes Rage In WA South

ABC News



Key Points

  • A Bridgetown resident has been critically injured fighting the fire
  • Four properties in Denmark and one in Hester have been razed
  • Police have sent arson squad detectives to Bridgetown to investigate
A Bridgetown resident is in a critical condition in hospital and five properties have been razed as twin bushfires wreak havoc in Western Australia's south.

On Sunday afternoon bushfire emergency warnings were issued for two other blazes in the state's Wheatbelt region, one in Shackleton in the shire of Bruce Rock, about 200 kilometres east of Perth, and another near Narrogin, about 200 kilometres south-east of Perth.

At about 7pm on Sunday evening the bushfire near Denmark, which destroyed four homes in its path, was downgraded.

Police are investigating the cause of the Bridgetown bushfire and have sent detectives from the specialist arson squad Strike Force Vulcan to the region.

Incident Controller Danny Mosconi confirmed the Bridgetown fire had now been contained but was not yet under control.

It has burned through 2380 hectares of land.

Mr Mosconi said reports of homes and property damaged in Hester were yet to be confirmed.

But it is believed there was minor damage to the shire depot, workshop and office and the water treatment plant.

The golf club was believed to have suffered extensive damage.

A bushfire viewed along a road at night
The bushfire at Bridgetown doubled in size on Saturday night and razed at least one home. (Supplied)

Mr Mosconi also said damage to the Timber Treaters site in Bridgetown had caused toxic fumes burning treated pine poles

Anyone within a 500-metre radius has been asked to evacuate for their own safety.

"We don't want people in that area to drink any of the water from tanks, to eat any produce from gardens in that area and also not to touch any dust on any play equipment or outside equipment," Mr Mosconi said.

Bridgetown's primary and secondary schools will be closed on Monday.

Man seriously injured at rural property

 Department of Fire and Emergency Service Commissioner Darren Klemm said a man had sustained serious burns while fighting the bushfire on his rural property near Bridgetown and had been taken to hospital.

Fiona Stanley Hospital in Perth later confirmed the man was in a critical but stable condition.

Commissioner Klemm said four homes in the Denmark region, on WA's Great Southern coast, had been lost in the fire, and another home had been damaged. Four other structures had also been razed — "outbuildings, chalets, sheds and the like".

A home in Hester, near Bridgetown, had also been razed he said.

The fires had been "extremely challenging" for firefighters, but he said milder weather conditions were expected to assist firefighters in Bridgetown today and tomorrow.

Commissioner Klemm said the Bridgetown fire, currently still at emergency warning level, was expected to be contained and under control by the end of the day.

However, westerly winds in Denmark will continue to pose challenges for firefighters there.
Close to 350 firefighters are battling blazes in parts of Bridgetown and Denmark, which have now burned through roughly 5,000 hectares of bushland.

A huge pall of orange smoke rises into the sky from a bushfire.
One local resident was badly burned while fighting the Bridgetown fire and is in a critical condition in hospital.(Facebook: Little Hill Farm)

Power has been restored to about 11,000 homes and businesses in the two towns that were without power overnight, however, more than 2,000 properties remain without electricity.

Bridgetown hospital evacuated

In Bridgetown residents of the town, as well as hospital patients and staff, were evacuated on Saturday and at least 200 people gathered at the evacuation centre.

The emergency department was closed on Saturday but has since reopened. However, there are still no plans to move evacuated patients back to the hospital.

Police said the cause of the fire was unknown, but Strike Force Vulcan detectives were investigating.

Bridgetown fire
Bushfire smoke over the town hall in Bridgetown.(Supplied: Michelle Moir Treestays)

The Department of Fire and Emergency Service's duty commissioner Rick Curtis said the fire escalated rapidly on Saturday afternoon.

He said there were reports of impacted properties to the north and north-east of the town.

Firefighters worked through the night battling the blaze at Hester, near Bridgetown. (DFES: Evan Collis)

An emergency warning remains in place for parts of Hester, Hester Brook, Bridgetown, Greenbushes, Catterick and Kangaroo Gully.

A bushfire watch and act alert is in place for Catterick, North Greenbushes, Benjinup, Winnejup and Kangaroo Valley.

fire trucks attend a bushfire at night
Fire crews worked through the night to build containment lines in Denmark.(Supplied: Emily Harper)

The fire started near the intersection of Hester Cascades Road and South Western Highway in Hester Brook. Some Bridgetown residents were allowed back into their homes today to retrieve essentials. However, police are now redirecting vehicles away from the town.

Cars at a police road block.
Some residents were allowed back into their Bridgetown homes to retrieve essentials as a the bushfire continued to threaten the town. (ABC News: Herlyn Kaur)

Residents in Boyup Brook have been advised by the Water Corporation to limit their water use, after the fire cut power to the pump stations supplying the town's water tank.

A fierefighter leans on a car as a blaze rages around him at night.
The fire at Hester, near Bridgetown in WA's South West, is feared to have destroyed properties. (DFES: Evan Collis)

Water will be carted to the town to supplement the supply when possible, the corporation said.

More than 180 people slept at an evacuation centre set up in Manjimup overnight.

Denmark residents fear for their homes

Many residents near Denmark had spent the night not knowing if their property had fallen victim to the flames after the fire barrelled towards the town.

McLeod Road resident Susan Asher feared her house might be gone and on Sunday authorities confirmed four homes in the region had been lost and another home had been damaged.

flames leap high into the air as firefighters look on
The scene near Denmark on Saturday.(Supplied)

"[There was] black massive smoke, a red glow and the noise was awful," she said.
"We were told they were there until midnight last night. The concern is it might be lost as the power's gone out, there's no water pressure.

"They said it was standing last night, [but] with the change of wind … we don't have a clue.
A bushfire watch and act alert is in place for parts of Shadforth and Scotsdale after the blaze was downgraded late on Sunday.

A firefigter moves through a fiercely burning fire ground at night, silhouetted by the fire.
The Bridgetown bushfire, which burnt throughout the night, has affected power and water supplies to nearby areas. (DFES: Evan Collis)

The fire is stationary but is still out of control and unpredictable, say local authorities.


Youtube How to prepare for bushfires | Emergency Tips

 About 190 firefighters are at the scene and are working to consolidate all boundaries.

The fire was first reported just before 9:30am on Friday. 

Shackleton bushfire escalates to include Corrigin, Kulin

The Shackleton bushfire emergency warning area includes the townships of Corrigin and Kulin.

It is bounded by Carger Road and Ardath West Road to the north, Eujiyn South Road, Babakin North Road, Parsons Road, Bruce Rock-Corrigin, Corrigin-Kondinin Road to the east, Bullaring-Gorge Rock Road to the south and Shackleton-Bilbarin Road to the west.

The fire is moving rapidly in a south-westerly direction and residents are advised to shelter in place as authorities say it is too late to leave.

About 140 firefighters are battling the blaze and strengthening containment lines.

Babakin Primary School will be closed on Monday.

Narrogin blaze elevated to emergency warning

Late on Sunday afternoon, a fire near Narrogin was also elevated to an emergency level.

The warning is in place for the Wickepin townsite and east of Narrogin in parts of Yillimining, Boundain, Nomans Lake and Toolibin in the shire of Narrogin.

The fire, which was reported just after 10:30am, was moving in an easterly direction and was not contained or controlled, with flames reaching two metres high, the alert said.

About 100 firefighters were at the scene and aerial support had been sent to assist ground crews.

Links

Lethal Heating is a citizens' initiative