King County Superior Court Judge Hollis Hill says young petitioners deserve 'their day in court' to protect their rights
climate change, a judge ruled.
King County Superior Court Judge Hollis Hill allowed the young petitioners to move ahead in their case against the state, writing that “it is time for these youth to have the opportunity to address their concerns in a court of law, concerns raised under statute and under the state and federal constitutions.”
The judge on Monday said Ecology had complied with her orders by adopting the Clean Air Rule within the timeline set by the court, and so denied the youth's request to find Ecology in contempt.
But the judge allowed the young people to amend their complaint and move ahead with their constitutional claims “so as to have their day in court,” she wrote.
“The Court takes this action due to the emergent need for coordinated science based action by the State of Washington to address climate change before efforts to do so are too costly and too late,” Hill wrote.
The petitioners can now go to court and argue that the state has violated their rights under the state constitution and the legal principle called the public trust doctrine, which requires the government to protect shared resources, said Andrea Rodgers, a Western Environmental Law Center attorney representing the youth.
All of the policies that the state has implemented in response to climate change are not resulting in emissions reductions that comply with state law and science, she said.
Ecology spokeswoman Camille St. Onge said the state has adopted one of nation's most progressive carbon pollution reduction regulations and “will continue to do our part to help slow climate change.”
The case is part of a larger effort led by the Oregon-based nonprofit Our Children's Trust to force governments to take action on climate change.
Last month, a federal judge in Eugene, Oregon, allowed a similar climate change case against President Barack Obama's administration to proceed. In that lawsuit, 21 activists ages 9 to 20 argue that the federal government's actions violate their constitutional rights to life, liberty, and property, and the government has violated its obligation to hold certain natural resources in trust for future generations.
A group of emperor penguins face a crack in the sea ice, near McMurdo Station, Antarctica. Kira Morris |
The petitioners say governments must adopt science-based prescriptions that protect the rights of young people and future generations to a stable climate.
The judge said she would retain jurisdiction in the case.
Links
- Teenagers Take the US Government to Trial Over Climate Change
- Norwegian Youths Sue Their Government Over Climate Change
- Judge: Youth Climate Change Lawsuit Against Feds Can Proceed
- Judge Sides With Kids Suing The Government Over Climate Inaction: ‘These Kids Can’t Wait’
- Call for giant Arctic ice-makers to prevent climate 'catastrophe'
- Climate change scientist fears more death threats under Trump
- Trump urged to scrap Obama's climate change strategy by 24 states
- 'America's only hope' urged to defy Trump over climate change
- California says it will sue if Trump ignores climate science
No comments :
Post a Comment