 |
| Lobster boats off the coast of Maine. (Courtesy of Malin Pinsky) |
“It’s like trying to raise cattle when you’ve taken down all the fences,” said Karrigan Börk, a professor at University of the Pacific McGeorge School of Law whose background includes a PhD in ecology. “Except you can’t even brand the fish. There’s no way to know which fish is yours.”
And in response to climate change, vital fishery stocks such as salmon and mackerel are migrating without paperwork. According to a new study being published Friday in Science magazine, coastal countries need to collaborate even more on international fishing regulations to prevent misuse of resources. Food, environmental and economic securities are at stake, it warns.
The study maps out the locations of fisheries and the national jurisdictions that govern them. The researchers' analysis is based on economic, legal, statistical and ecological data, which they used in sophisticated modeling to predict the future of international fisheries and to make recommendations for success.
“This isn’t some imaginary future threat,” said Malin Pinsky, an assistant professor at Rutgers University who helped lead researchers at six universities in a half-dozen countries as part of the Nippon Foundation-University of British Columbia Nereus Program.
Fisheries are critical to food security, jobs and economic stability. As far back as the 1600s, Great Britain and Iceland faced off over rights to the Atlantic cod; they negotiated their claims to the meaty half of fish and chips over the next several centuries. And after World War II, fishery disputes prompted militarized action in democratic countries. Navies were deployed. Protests were staged.
Modern international fishing rights are further complicated as oceans warm because of climate change. According to Angee Doerr, a research scientist who specializes in fisheries at the Stanford Center for Ocean Solutions, developing countries in tropical areas are particularly at risk. “Equatorial countries are highly dependent on fish as a protein source,” she said. As water temperatures increase, “fish are moving to stay within their comfortable range.” This means they may be leaving their traditional waters altogether.
But changes in a single fish species do not occur in a vacuum. They affect the entire food web, potentially altering the ecosystem for all species once one is affected. With increasing technology and computer modeling, however, scientists are getting closer to understanding what our future oceans may look like.
Pinsky and his colleagues analyzed 892 species of commercially important fish. They also examined 261 “exclusive economic zones” — areas of the ocean where countries have jurisdiction under international law. Using this data plus complex climate models incorporating ocean temperature, currents, oxygen levels and other factors, the scientists created a map of global fisheries projections. They outlined the likelihood of specific stocks moving into new economic zones, depending on various climate scenarios.
The study, which reflects an unusual combination of expertise from law, policy, economics, oceanography and ecology, suggests multi-species movement across dozens of countries' waters. On average, it says, fish are venturing into new territories at 43 miles per decade, a pace expected to continue and accelerate.
Challenges will only increase, according to the researchers. One reason is that policymakers often move more slowly than the fish. The study identifies gaps in international regulations for global fisheries, with the researchers expressing concern that limited attention is being paid to the cascading effect on the food chain.
Börk agreed that the issues around global fish stocks are increasingly interdisciplinary and need scientists and lawmakers working together to address them. Neither he nor Doerr were involved in the new study.
Conflicts can arise from just one new species entering a nation’s waters, which suggests the potential for big problems. The study predicts that areas with unclear international jurisdiction will be targets for conflict. Just this week in the South China Sea, fishing rights are being contested by Filipino officials who say the Chinese coast guard is confiscating fish catches in disputed areas.
“With adaptable agreements between states, we hope that ocean fisheries can continue to provide the myriad nutritional, livelihood and economic opportunities relied upon by billions of people around the world,” the study concludes.
But if fish stocks migrate to a new country before management is in place, there may be a period when the fish are literally lawless, meaning not governed by any entity.
“A fishery that’s shared for the first time [is] like two kids facing off for the last piece of cake," Pinsky said. "They’ll race to grab it and get cake smeared all over the table.”
Links
- Climate change means fish are moving faster than fishing rules, Rutgers-led study says
- Preparing ocean governance for species on the move
- Climate Change May Spark Global ‘Fish Wars’
- Mumbai’s glow-in-the-dark waves may be fueled by climate change, study says
- These whales will be extinct in 25 years, scientists say — unless we act to save them now
No comments :
Post a Comment