The World Loses Tree Cover The Size Of Bangladesh In 2017

SBS - Reuters

A new report says the world lost tree cover equivalent to the size of Bangladesh or Italy in 2017.

Image by Global Forest Watch

 An independent forest monitoring network said much of the tree cover was lost as forests were cleared using fire to make way for farms from the Amazon to the Congo Basin.
Tree cover loss, mostly in the tropics, totalled 294,000 square kilometres last year, just short of a record 297,000 square kilometres in 2016, according to Global Forest Watch.
The group is run by the US-based World Resources Institute (WRI).
Frances Seymour from the WRI said the rate of tree coverage being lost is startling.
“Tropical forests were lost at a rate equivalent to 40 football (soccer) fields per minute” in 2017, he told a news conference at a June 27-28 Oslo Tropical Forest Forum of 500 experts.

Global Forest Watch has mapped the loss of tree coverage. Supplied

The loss in tree coverage is comparable to the land size of Bangladesh or Italy, WRI said in its report.
"In total, the tropics experienced 15.8 million hectares of tree cover loss in 2017, an area the size of Bangladesh," the report stated.
Norwegian Environment Minister Ola Elvestuen said the pace of forest losses was “catastrophic” and threatened efforts to slow global warming. Trees soak up carbon dioxide from the air as they grow and release it when they burn or rot.
“Forest destruction is driving climate change,” he said. Norway has invested about $2.8 billion to safeguard tropical forests in the past decade - more than any other rich nation.
Brazil, Democratic Republic of Congo, Indonesia, Madagascar and Malaysia suffered the biggest losses in 2017, Global Forest Watch said, based on satellite data back to 2001.
The study omits, however, how far tree plantings or new growth offset the losses.
“Vast areas continue to be cleared for soy, beef, palm oil and other globally traded commodities. Much of this clearing is illegal,” Seymour said.
Brazil alone lost 45,000 sq km of tree cover, down 16 percent from a record in 2016. Fires raged in the southern Amazon region of Brazil.
Justin Adams, of the the Nature Conservancy environmental group, said only three percent of public finance for slowing climate change went to natural solutions like forests.
Well-managed forests can be a source of jobs and economic growth, he said.
Tree cover, however, is just one measure of the state of the world’s forests.
The UN’s Food and Agriculture Organization says the loss of forests worldwide slowed to just a net 33,000 sq kms a year from 2010-15, with annual losses of 76,000 sq kms offset by annual gains of 43,000.
Among differences, the FAO says that a forest where trees are deliberately felled to make way for new plantings is still a forest. Global Forest Watch registers the felling as tree cover loss.
Anssi Pekkarinen, a senior forestry officer of the FAO, said that the FAO method of identifying the underlying land use “gives a much more comprehensive picture on the world’s forests.”

Links

• Deforestation - Wikipedia
• Tropical forest tree-cover losses put at 39 million acres in 2017
• One football pitch of forest lost every second in 2017, data reveals
• Our Beef Addiction Has Contributed To Shocking New Deforestation Figures
• Forests are supposed to help stop climate change. These forests didn’t