Experts say it’s unusual to see so many places with such high rainfall across such a wide area. But identifying the cause is complicated
- NSW flooding: disaster zones declared as 18,000 people evacuated
- How three weather systems are crashing together
|
|
The return of another extreme weather crisis so soon has some
asking if this is another display of force from the long arm of the
climate crisis. Photograph: Jason O’Brien/EPA |
Falling on already soaked soils, the rains sparked dozens of flood warnings, with residents in parts of Sydney’s north and west also fearing for their homes and their lives.
The floods come a little over a year after the same areas were ablaze from unprecedented bushfires fueled by global heating that burned entire towns and killed billions of animals.
The return of another extreme weather crisis so soon has some asking if this is another display of force from the long arm of the climate crisis. The answer is a complex and nuanced one.
How wet has it been?
The extreme rainfall came after three weather systems combined, the Bureau of Meteorology has said.
|
| NSW floods bring new misery to community devastated by black summer bushfires. Read more |
Senior climatologist at the bureau Dr Blair Trewin is still crunching the rainfall numbers from recent days, but he says two things stand out.
While it is not unusual to have places with very high daily rainfall totals, it is unusual to see so many places with such extreme totals across such a wide area.
“Really the only area that’s missed out is the south coast so far,” he said, adding even that area is predicted to get good rainfall by the middle of the week.
He said the daily rainfall totals seen in some areas of the mid-north coast were not, on their own, unusual.
The highest reading of 406mm in one day fell near Kendall, south of Port Macquarie, on 20 March. But Trewin said in five of the last 12 years, a location in that area had recorded similar totals.
The focus, he said, was on analysing four-day totals, which would give a clearer picture of the sustained nature of the deluge.
The highest so far was at Comboyne, west of Port Macquarie, that saw 843mm in the four days up to 9am on Monday morning.
|
|
Kate Fotheringham and Wayne Bell on their wedding day on Gloucester
Road Wingham. Photograph: Amanda Hibbard |
The reason the rains of recent days were causing flooding, he said, was it was falling on areas that have just had a wetter-than-average summer.
The bureau was still analysing the data, but Trewin said there were other unusual factors to the event.
While a La Niña weather pattern is generally associated with wetter-than-average conditions, he said usually this had more impact in inland areas of NSW, not all the way along the coastline.
So what about climate change?
Whenever Australia experiences extreme weather events, the inevitable question arises: was this caused by climate change?
Some climate scientists will argue all weather events are influenced by human activity because we’ve rapidly changed the composition of the atmosphere.
|
|
Australia's summer the wettest in four years amid cooling La
Niña.
Read more |
And while the rainfall totals experienced over recent days are not yet confirmed as record-breaking, this does not mean that climate heating has had no effect at all.
Professor Steve Sherwood, of the Climate Change Research Centre at the University of New South Wales, says that basic physics shows a warmer atmosphere can hold more moisture – about 7% for each degree of warming.
“So we know that something like 5-10% of the rain we are getting now [in the current downpours] is from global warming and the rest would have happened anyway.
“It’s not a game changer, but it is making things worse and that gets worse still as emissions keep going up.”
How much extra rain could climate warming deliver?
As some climate scientists have said in relation to previous extreme events, a question that gets us closer to understanding what’s going on is how might climate heating have made an event worse than it would otherwise have been?
Australia’s latest State of the Climate report, released in 2020, says there has already been an increase in the intensity of heavy rainfall events in Australia. More warming will make things worse in the future, the report says.
One study Sherwood helped to carry out has suggested that 2C of warming in Australia could add between 11% and 30% more rain to the heaviest daily downpours.
|
|
‘Horrific’: swarms of spiders flee into homes – and up legs – to
escape NSW floods.
Read more |
Climate scientists carry out formal studies and have them peer-reviewed before they’re willing to say how climate heating has affected individual events.
But these “attribution studies” are especially challenging when it comes to rainfall because of all the different factors that can influence the systems that deliver rain.
One study on the 2010/11 floods in the north-east of Australia found the extra heat in the oceans had likely increased the amount of rain that fell. A study of extreme rainfall in the south-east of the country the following year failed to detect any human influence.
Extracting the fingerprint of human influence amid all that noise is a major challenge, says Dr Michael Grose, a climate projections scientist at CSIRO.
|
|
13 year old Ella Saul has braved the floodwaters on horse back to
help save her family’s cows. 85 of Gavin Saul’s cattle were swept
away in Kempsey, NSW. Photograph: Gavin Saul |
He said climate change could also be affecting the frequency of the weather systems that tend to deliver downpours, but this was “trickier to get at”.
He said: “The effect of climate change on the dynamics of the kind of weather patterns bringing the current flooding rains, including the high in the Tasman Sea and troughs creating ‘atmospheric rivers’, is a subject of ongoing research. It may be that this influence offsets or enhances the first effect.”
What about that one-in-100-years flood?
The NSW premier, Gladys Berejiklian, has said the mid-north coast is facing a “one-in-100-year event”.
Describing extreme flood events in this way – as the probability of an event happening in a given timeframe – is common but potentially misleading, argues Thomas Mortlock, a senior risk scientist at Risk Frontiers – a risk management and catastrophe modelling consultancy.
“We really need to get away from that terminology,” he said.
“People think that if it’s a one-in-100 year flood, that the chances of them experiencing that in their lifetime is practically zero. And it’s not.”
He said it is entirely possible to get three or four “one-in-100-year floods” coming along in close proximity.
Often, he said, these statements were based on incomplete data and were calculated presuming that other factors – such as flood mitigation or the climate – were stationary, which they are not.
“We need instead to talk about the probability of an event happening each year, or say, within the life of a mortgage,” he said.
In an unpublished briefing prepared by Risk Frontiers before the current floods, Mortlock writes: “To generalise, if you’ve experienced a large natural hazard event yesterday, it doesn’t necessarily lessen the chance of you experiencing the same or higher magnitude event tomorrow.
“You’re not safe for another 100 years if you’ve just been flooded by the 100-year event today.”
Andrew Gissing, a general manager at Risk Frontiers and an emergency management expert with the Bushfire and Natural Hazards CRC, said it had been long known that Sydney’s Hawkesbury and Nepean rivers often flooded (the New South Wales governor general Lachlan Macquarie wrote to settlers in 1817 warning them of the flood risk in that area.)
“Floods in Australia are more damaging than bushfires and they kill more people in the historical record. They are often an under-appreciated hazard,” Gissing said.
Climate heating was adding urgency to the need to improve flood mitigation, he said, and the current floods should add focus to actions like building flood levees, raising houses, voluntary acquisition of homes in at-risk regions or raising dams and weirs.
“The more we can invest in flood mitigation, the better,” he said.
Links
- ‘One-in-100 year’ rain could become norm, say climate watchers
- (AU) Former Emergency Chiefs: Climate Change Pushing Flood Events To Unprecedented Extremes
- Fire Brigade Employees’ Union calling for greater resources in response to climate change related natural disasters
- Gladys Berejiklian was wrong to say the NSW floods were beyond anyone’s expectations
- NSW facing a 'dangerous situation' as around 18,000 people evacuated during flood disaster
- Australia floods: NSW inundated with torrential rain – in pictures
- 'Never seen anything like it': locals watch helplessly as floodwaters rise across New South Wales
No comments :
Post a Comment