Treasurer Jim Chalmers unveiled the 2025 Federal Budget on March 25, promising billions for green industries. But critics say it's too little, too late.
$3 Billion for Green Energy—Enough?
The government pledged $3 billion to boost green metals and hydrogen. Chalmers called it an investment in a “Future Made in Australia.” He argued it would attract investors and create jobs.
Environmental groups aren’t convinced. “It’s window dressing,” said climate activist Sarah Evans. “We need urgent action, not just industry handouts.”
Voters Want More
Polling shows Australians want stronger climate policies. Many say the budget falls short. “People see through the spin,” said economist Daniel Wright. “They want real emissions cuts, not just money thrown at projects.”
Disasters Costing Billions
The budget admits climate-related disasters have already cost Australia $13.5 billion. But critics say the response is reactive, not preventive. “We’re paying the price for inaction,” said environmental analyst Lisa Tran.
Global Pressures Add to Uncertainty
The budget also warns of economic risks from global trade shifts. It points to U.S. policies that could disrupt Australia’s economy.
A Missed Opportunity?
While the budget puts cash into green industries, many argue it doesn’t go far enough. “This was the chance to lead on climate,” said Wright. “Instead, we got half-measures.”
The debate is far from over.
Links
- 2025 Budget Ignores Voters Seeking Environmental Action
- The 2025 federal budget fails the millions of voters who want action on Australia’s struggling environment
- The 2025 budget has few savings and surprises but it also ignores climate change
- The Federal Budget: three highlights and lowlights for climate
- Disaster response storm brewing over federal finances
- Energy & Climate Policy | Latest News & Analysis
- News & Analysis
No comments :
Post a Comment