Government's 2035 climate goal exposes economic and social fault lines - Lethal Heating Editor BDA

Key Points

Government raises 2035 emissions reduction target to 62–70% below 2005 levels[1] Net-zero commitment for 2050 reaffirmed[2] Focus on renewable energy investment and transition[3] Mixed reactions from experts across key sectors[4]

Scientists and community leaders have expressed mixed feelings about the Federal Government's plan to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 62 to 70 percent by 2035. 

While some appreciate the clear targets, others feel there are no solid transition plans. 

This leads to concerns that Australia may not keep temperature rises below 1.5°C. 

Government ministers maintain that the proposed cuts are based on technical modelling and sector-specific strategies. 

They also mention guidance from the Climate Change Authority, and stress comprehensive decarbonisation plans will support these targets in both industry and energy.

The focus is now on how to implement this plan effectively. 

Questions remain about funding and how to assist vulnerable communities and regions during the transition.

Expert responses

• Prof. Sarah Martin, Social Policy Analyst: "The higher 62 to 70 per cent target is significant progress. However, without a just transition plan, vulnerable communities will carry the heaviest burdens."^[5]
• Dr. Michael Chen, Chief Economist, Institute for Sustainable Futures: "This range provides flexibility, but Australia must lock in the upper end if we are serious about competitiveness and cost savings from renewables."^[6]
• Dr. Amina Patel, Ecologist, University of Sydney: "A 70 per cent cut could reduce biodiversity risks dramatically. Yet land-clearing exemptions still undermine ecosystem resilience."^[7]
• Hon. James O’Connor, Shadow Energy Minister: "The government’s target is aspirational but lacks a credible roadmap for grid reliability and workforce reskilling."^[8]
• Prof. Daniel Wright, Cultural Historian: "This shift will reshape Australian identity. Our culture is moving from a resource-based narrative to one defined by responsibility and innovation."^[9]
• Dr. Helen Ford, Climate Policy Specialist: "The 62–70 per cent range is in line with IPCC advice. But Australia must show consistency in annual progress reporting."^[10]
• Assoc. Prof. Liam Nguyen, Energy Systems Engineer: "Meeting even the lower end requires rapid transmission build-out. Current planning timelines are far too slow."^[11]
• Dr. Emily Zhao, Public Health Expert: "Cleaner air from deep emissions cuts will save lives. The target is welcome but should be framed as a public health win as well."^[12]
• Mr. Robert Taylor, Business Council of Australia: "The private sector supports ambition. But we need policy certainty and investment frameworks to deliver at scale."^[13]
• Dr. Fiona Kelly, Indigenous Knowledge Scholar: "Climate action that ignores Indigenous land management risks repeating past mistakes. The 70 per cent figure must embed First Nations leadership."^[14]

References

1. ABC News – Australia raises 2035 climate target ↩ Back to text
2. Department of Climate Change – Net Zero by 2050 ↩ Back to text
3. Clean Energy Council – Renewable Energy Investment ↩ Back to text
4. Sydney Morning Herald – Mixed reactions to climate target ↩ Back to text
5. UNSW Social Policy Research Centre ↩ Back to text
6. UTS – Institute for Sustainable Futures ↩ Back to text
7. University of Sydney – School of Life and Environmental Sciences ↩ Back to text
8. Parliament of Australia – Shadow Energy Minister Statements ↩ Back to text
9. The Conversation – Cultural impacts of climate change ↩ Back to text
10. IPCC – Climate Change Mitigation Pathways ↩ Back to text
11. Australian Renewable Energy Agency ↩ Back to text
12. Public Health Association of Australia ↩ Back to text
13. Business Council of Australia ↩ Back to text
14. CSIRO – Indigenous Knowledge and Climate ↩ Back to text

Back to top