20/09/2019

The Good, The Bad And The Ugly: The Nations Leading And Failing On Climate Action

The Conversation - 

Children play near a coal-fired power plant in the town of Obilic, Kosovo, in November 2018. EPA/Valdrin Xhemaj 
It is almost five years since the landmark Paris deal was struck. Nearly 200 countries agreed to work towards limiting global warming to 1.5℃, beyond which the planet is expected to slide irreversibly towards devastating climate change impacts.
But few nations are on track to reaching this goal. Right now, we’re heading to warming above 3℃ by 2100 - and this will have catastrophic consequences for the planet.
United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres has called a major climate summit in New York on September 23, where countries are expected to announce more ambitious climate targets than they set in Paris, and solid plans to achieve them.
Ahead of the summit, let’s take stock of the world’s best and worst performers when it comes to tackling the climate emergency.
A man standing near a wind farm near Urumuqi, China. Qilai Shen/EPA
Australia is keeping poor company
The Climate Action Tracker is an independent scientific analysis produced by two research organisations tracking climate action since 2009. It monitors 32 countries, accounting for more than 80% of global emissions.
We looked in detail at who has made the most progress since 2015, and who has done the least. Australia sits firmly in the group of governments we labelled as actually delaying global climate action, alongside the United States (which under President Donald Trump has walked away from the Paris agreement altogether).
Other countries delaying global climate action with highly insufficient targets and no progress since 2015 are the Russian Federation, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Indonesia.
Australia’s greenhouse gas emissions, past and projected. Data drawn from Department of the Environment and Energy report titled ‘Australia’s emissions projections 2018’ Department of the Environment and Energy
Today, Australia’s emissions are at a seven-year high, and continue to rise. The government’s commitment to fossil fuels remains unwavering - from coal projects such as Adani’s proposed Carmichael mine in Queensland to huge new gas projects.
Australia is the world’s largest exporter of coal, providing 29% of coal’s global trade, and last year also became the world’s largest exporter of liquefied natural gas. Its exported fossil fuel emissions currently represent around 3.6% of global emissions.

The surprising success stories
Ethiopia, Morocco and India top the list of countries doing the most to tackle climate change. In total, eight international jurisdictions have made good progress since 2015, including the European Union, Canada, Chile, Costa Rica, and Argentina (although they still have a lot of work ahead to meet the 1.5℃ goal).
While India still relies on coal, its renewables industry is making huge leaps forward, with investments in renewable energy topping fossil fuel investments. The country is expected to over-achieve its Paris Agreement target.
Lightning in the night sky over the Odervorland wind farm near Sieversdorf, Germany. Patrick Pleul/DPA
So what are they doing right? Costa Rica’s national decarbonisation plan covers the entire economy, including electrifying the public transport system, and huge energy efficiency measures in the industry, transport and buildings sectors. Costa Rica has also put a moratorium on new oil production.
The EU is set to overachieve its 2030 target of reducing emissions by 40% below 1990 levels by 2030 and is in the process of considering an increase in this to at least 50%. It has recently increased its renewable energy and energy efficiency goals, and is sorting out its emissions trading scheme, with prices of emission units increasing.
This, together with past investments in renewable energy, have helped to achieve a 15% reduction in German electricity sector emissions in the first half of 2019. Whilst Germany has missed its 2020 targets, it has begun a process to phase out coal no later than 2038 – still a number of years too late for a Paris-compatible pathway.

Quitting coal is key
An increasing number of countries are adopting net zero emissions targets, many of them in the European Union, and some outside. Some, like the UK, have dumped coal, and are well on the way to achieving those targets.
A global phase-out of coal for electricity is the single most important step toward achieving the 1.5℃ warming limit. At the latest, this should be achieved by 2050 globally, by 2030 in the OECD and 2040 in China and other Asian countries.
There are some signs of optimism here. On one estimate, the number of coal projects in the pipeline shrunk by nearly 70% between 2015 and 2018, and investors are increasingly wary of the technology. Yet coal is still set to boom in Indonesia, the Philippines, Japan and Turkey.
Under current polities, the world is set for more than 3°C of warming by 2100. Climate Action Tracker



In 2018, energy-related carbon dioxide emissions reached a historic high. While coal reversed its recent decline, emissions from natural gas surged by 4.6%.
Renewable energy is the key to unlocking rapid decarbonisation. It already supplies more than 26% of global electricity generation and its costs are dropping rapidly. To accelerate this fundamental transition, more governments need to adopt and improve policies that enable renewable technologies to be rolled out faster. This would contribute to low-carbon economic development and job creation.

Don’t forget about trees
Nowhere is the alarming rate of global deforestation more obvious than in Brazil, now in the middle of a record fire season. It adds to damage wrought by President Jair Bolsonaro who has weakened his country’s institutional framework preventing forest loss.
In 2018, Brazil recorded the world’s highest loss of tropical primary rainforest of any country - 1.3 million hectares - largely in the Amazon. The deforestation reached 7,900 square km in 2018, a 72% increase from the historic low in 2012.
Fire fighting efforts this month in an indigenous reserve in Humaita, in Brazil’s Amazon forest. FERNANDO BIZERRA/EPA
The past few weeks have shown us what 1℃ of global warming means. Hurricane Dorian, fuelled by high sea-surface temperatures, wiped out the northern Bahamas. Temperatures in the 40s set records across Europe. And in Queensland, the earliest fire season on record destroyed homes and razed rainforests.
The predicted 3℃ of warming by 2100 will bring a lot worse: widespread crop failures, dead coral reefs, more extreme heat waves and major threats to water supply and human health.
The world can avoid this, but time is running out.

Links

What Is The UN Climate Action Summit?

Climate Home News - 

It’s been billed as the defining political event for climate in 2019. But what is it?
UN secretary-general Antonio Guterres (Photo: UN)
UN secretary general António Guterres is hosting a climate summit in New York on 23 September to ramp up global efforts to tackle the climate crisis.
The high-level meeting at the UN headquarters is a critical moment for political leaders to show their willingness to increase their climate plans and deepen the decarbonisation of their economies.
Here is how it’s going to work.

When and where?
The summit will take place over three days 21-23 September at UN Headquarters in New York. With a culminating summit of national leaders on Monday 23.

What’s going to happen?
A youth climate summit on Saturday 21 September will open the meeting, bringing together young activists, entrepreneurs and change-makers on the day following the world’s first global climate strike.
On Sunday, the nine coalitions are due to meet to take stock of their recent work and finalise details before Monday’s big reveal.
Monday’s plenary meeting, the main event, will be a combination of presentations from the best national plans and coalition initiatives being showcased on stage.

Why another UN climate meeting? Isn’t the Paris Agreement already acting as a compass for action?
Despite commitments by governments to tackle the climate crisis, global greenhouse gas emissions continue to rise year on year.
Under the Paris Agreement, countries pledged to limit global temperature rise “well below” 2C of warming. But current national commitments will struggle to hold warming below 3C by the end of the century.
Countries have also agreed to review and update their climate plans every five years, with a view to progressively increase their emissions reductions targets. The first stage of this process is due next year.
To galvanise political leadership for ambition at a time when much of the world is gripped by a surge of nationalism and turning inwards, Guterres personally convened the summit, backing it with the full force of the UN machine.
It is expected to be a critical moment for climate diplomacy, intended to kick-start the process of increasing countries’ climate plans.

What is Guterres demanding?
“Bring plans, not speeches,” Guterres told countries.
In a letter sent to every head of state, the UN chief set-out his expectations for the summit, urging governments to come with concrete and meaningful plans for action.
Excerpts of the letter, showed Guterres asked all leaders to come “ready to announce the plans that they will set next year to reduce greenhouse gas emissions for 2030 and to achieve net zero emissions by 2050”.
His demands, in line with the tougher 1.5C goal of the Paris deal, set a high benchmark for ambition. Reaching carbon neutrality by 2050 is something only a handful of largely developed countries have so far committed to do.
Guterres also called on countries to reduce emissions by 45% by 2030, end fossil fuel subsidies and ban new coal plants after 2020 – a set of asks unusually prescriptive for the head of the UN.

What noises are coming from governments?
Countries are expected to compete for the spotlight with only the most ambitious and meaningful plans being showcased on stage on Monday 23, with the aim to spur a race to the top.
Between 80 and 100 countries have suggested they were ready to increase their climate plans ahead of schedule, with some countries signalling they could make an announcement at the summit, according to the UN.
Special envoy for climate change Luis Alfonso de Alba said a number of countries had told the UN they were “committed to be reaching new [climate] plans but they might not be ready to do that by the summit”. The UN is also expecting countries to set-out how they are going to meet their targets and plan to increase them.
Indications of what large emitters might bring to the summit remain mixed. Days before the summit, de Alba said he was “very confident” that China will come to the summit with clear commitments and “a much higher level of ambition”.
The UN has repeatedly pointed to a statement signed by China, France, and Guterres on the margins of the G20 as an indication of Beijing’s plans. It included a commitment to increase their climate plans and publish their “long-term mid-century low greenhouse gas emissions development strategies by 2020”, something Beijing could flesh out at the event.
In a communique released last week, EU Commission outgoing vice-president for the energy union Maroš Šefčovič said the EU will bring “the fruit of our work”, which he described as “a realistic perspective of a climate-neutral Europe by 2050, backed by ambitious policies set in binding legislation.” The Commission is hoping members states can agree on the target by early next year, but must overcome resistance from some holdouts.
The US is not part of the conversation at the moment. For China and the EU, the ultimate deadline to come up with more ambitious plans will be next year’s climate talks. And yet, without a strong indication that the world’s largest emitters are ready to take more robust climate action, the summit’s success could be compromised.

So is this all about competition?
No, it’s also about cooperation.
Besides, a push for countries to increase their climate plans, preparation for the summit have seen the creation of nine tracks – or coalitions – under which governments together with businesses, NGOs and other international organisations are expected to present meaningful, realistic and scalable initiatives.
The tracks have been led by national governments and include mitigation (Chile), energy transition (Denmark and Ethiopia); industry transition (India and Sweden); climate finance and carbon pricing (France, Jamaica and Qatar), infrastructure, cities and local action (Turkey and Kenya); nature-based solutions (China and New Zealand), resilience and adaptation (UK and Egypt), youth engagement and public mobilisation (Marshall Islands and Ireland) and social and political drivers (Peru and Spain).
Each track is led by an alliance of countries working with a range of partners, including businesses and civil society. The proposals emerging from these tracks should be “transformational”, the UN said, in a way that doesn’t leave communities who depend on fossil fuels for their livelihood behind.

Who is coming?
60 heads of states are expected to take the podium to announce more ambitious plans – or at least plans to plan in time for next year’s climate talks.
Some of those expected to make an appearance include India’s prime minister Narendra Modi, France’s president Emmanuel Macron, the UK’s prime minister Boris Johnson and German chancellor Angela Merkel. China is due to send a lower-ranking minister than initially anticipated – and the foreign minister is expected to be in attendance.
Neither US president Donald Trump, nor Australian prime minister Scott Morrison will attend the summit despite both attending the UN’s assembly general later in the week. Foreign minister Marise Payne and ambassador for the environment Patrick Suckling are expected to represent Australia, while US state department officials are also due to attend.
Besides business and civil society representatives, more than 500 young people have been selected to attend the summit, with youth due to play a key role throughout the event. The UN has funded travel “as carbon-neutral as possible” to New York for 100 young climate leaders from across the world.
Greta Thunberg, who crossed the Atlantic on a race boat as an alternative to flying, is also due to have a speaking role during the three-day event.

What happens next?
The summit is a political moment for world leaders to take concrete steps to ramp up ambition. It doesn’t replace the annual climate negotiations talks, which this year are taking place in December in Santiago, Chile.
Instead, the summit marks an additional step for countries to build momentum ahead of the 2020 climate talks – the most important negotiating moment since the Paris Agreement when countries are due to announce how they are going to update their climate plans.
Following the summit, Guterres is expected to write an analytical report about the meeting’s achievement in securing additional emissions reduction pledges and the support needed to implement the proposed initiatives.
The report is due to be presented at Cop25 in Chile.

Links

China And India Demand Cash For Climate Action On Eve Of UN Summit

Climate Home News - 

World’s largest and fourth largest emitters said the onus remained on the countries historically responsible for climate change to move money 
India Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Chinese President Xi Jinping (Photo: Russian President's office)
China and India demanded rich countries provide financial support for them to increase their climate plans, as leaders prepared to meet at a UN summit in New York.
The summit has been personally convened by UN secretary general António Guterres as a moment for political leaders to show their willingness to increase their climate plans and deepen the decarbonisation of their economies.
Guterres asked governments to come ready to announce the plans they will set next year.
But in separate statements published on Tuesday, the world’s first and fourth largest emitters put the onus on rich countries to fulfil their commitments to mobilise $100 billion per year by 2020 for developing countries to cope with the impacts of climate change.
As the largest developing country, China “also enjoys the right to receive funds”, it in a statement published by the ministry of ecology and environment.
It said developed countries should “implement and strengthen” and “honour the commitment” to “support the developing world in addressing climate change”.
In its statement, India’s ministry of finance said its plan was set on a “best effort” basis and that “finance holds a key for all its actions”.
With uncertain finance and technology provision, “India can only aspire to implement the already promised climate actions”, the statement said. It added that India “may only be in a position to elaborate or clarify its post 2020 climate” plan at the summit.
Instead, India said will be “better placed” to “suitably recalibrate [its climate plan] through re-examination and improvement,” in 2023, when the next global stocktake to ramp up ambition is due to take place.
The UN summit will include a discussion of climate finance, but it has not been given the primacy of Guterres’ call for ambition.
Beijing set out its action on the summit’s nine work tracks, but remained ambiguous on what it might bring to podium on Monday.
China reaffirmed its commitment to implement the Paris Agreement, but fell short of making any commitments on its climate targets for Monday’s summit.
Its contribution to climate change, it said, includes the country’s 2020 and 2030 climate targets and the establishment of “an economic system that is green and low-carbon cycle development”. It added it would “actively implement emission reduction commitments, and strengthen climate adaptation”.
“In light of tough economic and geopolitical prospects, China is pondering its options on climate,” Li Shuo, senior energy and climate policy officer at Greenpeace China told Climate Home News, adding that Beijing’s position paper left “plenty of wiggle room for a decision to double down on climate targets in 2020”.
Last week, UN special envoy for climate change Luis Alfonso de Alba said he was “very confident” that China will come to the summit “with a much higher level of ambition”, referring to a statement it issued with France and Guterres on the sidelines of the G20.
However, the stronger language in the G20 statement in which China committed to “update” its climate target “in a manner representing a progression beyond the current one” and publish a long term decarbonisation strategy by 2020, is absent from its position paper.
Even the language of China as a “torchbearer” for climate action previously used by president Xi Jinping was absent, with instead references to China as “an active participant and defender of the multilateral climate process”.
“True leaders rise to the challenges of their time,” warned Li. “If geopolitical challenges have left Chinese leaders unsure, the country’s over-achievements of its climate targets and the improving air quality should offer confidence,” he said.
Both China and India’s positions echoed a statement issued alongside Brazil and South Africa last month, highlighting the need for developed countries with greater historic emissions to shoulder greater responsibility.
For Xi’s government, this principle is “the basis for mutual trust” and the “conditions for the full and effective implementation of the Paris Agreement”, according to its latest statement.
Luca Bergamaschi, a senior associate at think-tank E3G, said China and India were developing clean technologies some time at a faster pace than developed countries.
“In a truly globalised world, this old north-south divide does not make sense,” he said.
“Although there is still a high responsibility for developed countries to provide more climate finance and lead with climate action, there is a need for much more cooperation to create open, ‘zero-carbon’ markets and to accelerate technology uptake and green finance reforms.”

Links

19/09/2019

Greta Thunberg To Congress: ‘You’re Not Trying Hard Enough. Sorry’

The Guardian - 

Greta Thunberg attends a Senate climate change taskforce meeting in Washington DC. Photograph: Mark Wilson/Getty Images
At a meeting of the Senate climate crisis task force on Tuesday, lawmakers praised a group of young activists for their leadership, their gumption and their display of wisdom far beyond their years. They then asked the teens for advice on how Congress might combat one of the most urgent and politically contentious threats confronting world leaders: climate change.
Greta Thunberg, the 16-year-old Swedish activist who has galvanized young people across the world to strike for more action to combat the impact of global warming, politely reminded them that she was a student, not a scientist – or a senator.
“Please save your praise. We don’t want it,” she said. “Don’t invite us here to just tell us how inspiring we are without actually doing anything about it because it doesn’t lead to anything.
“If you want advice for what you should do, invite scientists, ask scientists for their expertise. We don’t want to be heard. We want the science to be heard.”
In remarks meant for Congress as a whole, she said: “I know you are trying but just not hard enough. Sorry.”
The audience laughed. Supporters broke into applause. Senator Ed Markey, the Massachusetts Democrat who co-sponsored the Green New Deal and leads the Senate task force, was perhaps surprised by her bluntness. But he smiled.
Seated at the table with the teens were some of the most sympathetic and vocal supporters of bold action on climate change in Congress. But facing a Republican-controlled Senate and a hostile White House, the prospect of enacting reforms at the scale and scope called for by activists – and many scientists – is bleak.
“We need your leadership,” Markey told Thunberg. “Young people are the army politically, which has arrived in the United States. You put a spotlight on this issue in a way that it has never been before. And that is creating a new X factor.”
Still, he vowed to try: “We hear you. We hear what you’re saying and we will redouble our efforts.”
Thunberg was one of several youth activists invited to address the task force during two days of action and speeches aimed at urging lawmakers to support “transformative climate action”. She was joined by activists from across the US and South America, part of a “multiracial, intergenerational” effort to combat climate change.

Nadia Nazar, co founder of Zero Hour, speaks to the media on 17 September in Washington DC. Photograph: Eric Baradat/AFP/Getty Images
“The generation of the Green New Deal will not only survive but we will thrive,” said Nadia Nazar, co-founder of the advocacy group Zero Hour, at a news conference earlier on Tuesday.
“We will no longer be known as the kids fighting the apocalypse. We will be known as the solution to the climate crisis.”
In the US, support for sweeping action on climate change is polarized. Many Republicans – among them Donald Trump – are still openly skeptical of the science behind global warming. Republican leaders have mocked Democrats for introducing a Green New Deal and have used the proposal as a cudgel against lawmakers and presidential candidates.
The Green New Deal is an ambitious 14-page resolution that calls for a “10-year national mobilization” that would eliminate the nation’s emissions in one decade. Scientists say limiting warming to 1.5C would require cutting manmade carbon levels by 45% by 2030 and reaching net zero around 2050.
Markey said their movement is shifting the political landscape. The senator pointed to the 2020 presidential debates as evidence of what has changed. Candidates are being asked about climate change and pushed to introduce plans to combat global warming. This is in stark contrast to 2016.
“What has happened? You have happened,” he told the activists. “You are giving this extra level of energy to the political process that is absolutely changing the dynamics of politics in the United States.”
The 2020 election, Markey said, will in many ways be a “referendum on climate change”.
Thunberg arrived in the US after crossing the Atlantic on a solar-powered yacht. She rose to international prominence after launching “Fridays for Future”: student-led strikes that have spread to 135 countries. She has been nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize.
On Monday, she met Barack Obama. The former president shared a photo from their meeting, in which he praised Thunberg as “one of our planet’s greatest advocates” and someone who is “unafraid to push for real action”.

'We're a team': Greta Thunberg visits Barack Obama

Later on Tuesday, the group was scheduled to meet Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who is a co-sponsor of the Green New Deal in the House.
On Wednesday, Thunberg will deliver what has been billed as a “major address” to members of Congress.

PROFILE: Who is Greta Thunberg?
'Never too small to make a difference'
In August 2018 Thunberg began a solo climate protest by striking from school in Sweden when aged 15. She has since been joined by tens of thousands of school and university students in Australia, Belgium, Germany, the United States, Japan and more than a dozen other countries.

'Irresponsible children'
Speaking at the United Nations climate conference in December 2018, she berated world leaders for behaving like irresponsible children. And in January 2019 she rounded on the global business elite in Davos: “Some people, some companies, some decision-makers in particular, have known exactly what priceless values they have been sacrificing to continue making unimaginable amounts of money. And I think many of you here today belong to that group of people.”

Inspiration
Veteran climate campaigners are astonished by what has been achieved in such a short time. Thunberg has described the rapid spread of school strikes for climate around the world as amazing. “It proves you are never too small to make a difference,” she said. Her protests were inspired by US students who staged walk-outs to demand better gun controls in the wake of multiple school shootings.

Family
Her mother, Malena Ernman, has given up her international career as an opera singer because of the climate effects of aviation. Her father is actor Svante Thunber. Greta has Asperger’s syndrome, which in the past has affected her health, he says. She sees her condition not as a disability but as a gift which has helped open her eyes to the climate crisis.

Links

Are You Ready For The Global Climate Strike?



The next Global Climate Strike is coming up on Friday, 20th September, with events planned in over 100 Australian towns and cities. Here is everything you need to know about the strike and how you can get involved.
  • What: Global #ClimateStrike
  • When: Friday, 20th September, 2019
  • Where: 100 town and city centres around Australia (click here to find a strike near you)
  • Who: Anyone and everyone who wants to see climate action now

Major cities:

Pink button: Canberra
Pink button: Darwin
Pink button: Hobart
Pink button: Perth
Pink button: Adelaide
Pink button: Brisbane
Pink button: Sydney
Pink button: Melbourne

Social media assets
To promote the event and get your friends on board, a suite of social media assets have been created for you to download and share on your own social media pages. When you share content on social media, use the hashtag #ClimateStrike to get involved in the conversation!

Workers’ Guide
The ability to strike is an internationally recognised right, but in Australia, there are a number of regulations around it.
There are, however, a number of ways you can attend the strike within the bounds of your workplace agreement, including:
  • Taking a longer lunch break
  • Organising a workplace action
  • Taking formal leave or using your time off in lieu (TOIL)
  • Getting your workplace to pass a resolution (permission for you and your colleagues to participate in the strike without penalty)
For more information about these ideas, click here.

Many Australian workplaces are getting behind the strikes, and encouraging their employees to take part in the march.
In fact, over 1000 businesses have pledged to support their workers through the group Not Business As Usual. Why not get your workplace to sign up too?

Still have questions? Visit the Global #ClimateStrike FAQs here.

Australian school strikers are part of a global movement which is collaborating on the Global #ClimateStrike on September 20. Around the world, strikes and actions will be taking place across the week of September 20-27.
Visit schoolstrike4climate.com for more information about the climate strikes in Australia.

Links

'Going To The Streets Again': What You Need To Know About Friday's Climate Strike

The Guardian - 

Organisers expect a stronger presence from unions, workers and companies as student activists reach out to adults
Australian school students are set to walk out of classrooms again to call for climate action as part of a global strike three days before a UN summit. Photograph: Dan Peled/AAP
Thousands of Australian school students are again preparing to walk out of classrooms across the country to demand action on the climate crisis.
The global mass day of action will take place on Friday 20 September, three days before the United Nations climate summit in New York.
It follows strikes in March this year in which 150,000 people marched in Australia and 1.5 million took part worldwide.
Organisers expect next week’s global strikes will be bigger and, this time there will be a much stronger presence from unions, workers and companies that have signed up to strike in solidarity with the young activists.
Here’s a guide to what’s happening.

Where will the strikes take place?
Strikes are planned in 120 countries across the world including almost 100 locations across Australia, from the major centres of Sydney and Melbourne to the small rural town of Wollar in New South Wales. There will be strikes in all capital cities and in regional centres such as Albury, Orange and Bendigo.
Organisers are anticipating the largest crowds this time will be in Melbourne, where the strikes coincide with the last day of the Victorian public school term.
“This massive day of action is going to be fundamental towards advocating for more efficient action on climate change,” Evan Meneses, a 17-year-old organiser for the Adelaide strike, said.
He said this was especially the case for Australia “given there is very little concrete evidence to suggest we’re achieving what was laid out in the Paris agreement”.
“There’s something that really connects with people when people as young as eight or 13 are advocating for action on the climate crisis because people that young are not the ones who should be having to [do so].”
The details for capital cities are as follows (all times are local).
  • Sydney 12 noon – The Domain
  • Melbourne 2pm – Treasury Gardens
  • Brisbane 1pm – Queens Gardens
  • Canberra 12 noon –Glebe Park
  • Adelaide 12 noon – Victoria Square
  • Darwin 1pm – Parliament
  • Perth 11am – Forrest Place
  • Hobart 12 pm – Parliament
  • The full list of strike locations is here.
Who is going?
Organisers expect hundreds of thousands of people, including students and their parents, to take part.
The strikes will also have a strong presence from workers and unions. So far, 30 unions have signed up including the Australian Education Union, the Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation and the CPSU.
Faith groups, including the Anglican and Uniting churches, have pledged their support for students. And hundreds of companies are giving staff time off to strike or finding other ways to express solidarity.
School students at the #ClimateStrike rally at Town Hall in Sydney in March. Photograph: Mick Tsikas/AAP
Last week companies including Atlassian, Future Super and KeepCup formed an alliance called Not Business as Usual that is urging businesses to support employees who want to strike. What began as an alliance of about 20 businesses has grown to almost 1,000 as of Friday afternoon
Intrepid Travel is one of the companies giving employees a chance to participate in the strike.
Its chief executive, James Thornton, said: “We stand in solidarity to support the next generation as they demand climate action. It is real, it is happening and it’s time for global business leaders to do their part.”

What started this movement?
The students have been inspired by the Swedish school student Greta Thunberg, whose strikes outside the Swedish parliament sparked a global movement.
In November 2018, thousands of Australian school students went on strike and that was followed by the mass global day of action in March.
Thunberg is in New York for the UN climate summit after making a transatlantic trip on a zero emissions sailboat.
A youth summit, featuring some of the school strikers, including young Australian organisers, will take place in the lead-up to the UN conference.

What do the students want and how will these strikes differ to those in March?
The Australia students have three demands for governments.
  1. No new coal, oil and gas projects, including the Adani mine.
  2. 100% renewable energy generation and exports by 2030.
  3. Fund a just transition and job creation for all fossil-fuel workers and communities.
The third point is a new feature for the Australian movement and particularly important for these strikes.
The strong presence of workers at these strikes is about trying to end the pitting of climate action and the needs of the economy against each other. Instead, the young activists want constructive action to support workers in carbon-intensive industries as economies transition to net zero emissions.
Alexa Stuart, a 15-year-old organiser of the Newcastle strike, said: “While it’s really important that we recognise that students are feeling scared about the impact of the climate crisis on our future, it’s also very important to recognise that, in Newcastle especially, there are a lot of jobs in the coalmining industry.
“Those jobs are the livelihoods of many people.
“It’s why it’s especially important that we’re starting to have conversations in the Hunter region about a just transition so no one is left behind and we can still have a positive impact on climate change.”
The #ClimateStrike rally at Town Hall in Sydney in March. Australian students are preparing to strike again at 100 locations across Australia. Photograph: Mick Tsikas/AAP
Varsha Yajman, 17, is a student at Gosford high school and an organiser of the Sydney strike. She said the federal election, at which the Coalition government was returned despite its lack of effective climate policy, had made the movement realise “we had to reach out to people beyond the student community”.
“With the election result, it became quite evident that a lot of people think our movement has just created instability for workers in the coal industry,” she said.
“A just transition for all workers is really, really important to us.
“We think a lot of teenagers are already aware of the impact of the climate crisis. We realised we need to reach out to adults and workers and demand their attention.”

Why are these strikes happening?
Young people are anxious about what their future looks like in a world that is failing to stall the climate crisis.
In the last week alone in Australia, bushfires have torn through Queensland and New South Wales in the first week of spring. They have been described as unprecedented.
Last summer brought a wave of natural disasters and record-breaking heat. For the first eight months of the year, the country’s mean temperature was the second warmest on record. Mean maximums were the warmest on record over the same period and mean minimums the equal-sixth warmest.
Authorities are warning of a grim outlook into the coming summer if current dry conditions and above average temperatures persist across much of the country.
Aoibhinn Crimmins, a 17-year-old student at Dickson College and an organiser of the Canberra strike, said the March strikes were designed as a “wake-up call” on climate ahead of the federal election.
“This strike is going to be much more about standing up in the face of adversity because the election result was not what we were expecting,” she said.
“We are going to the streets again showing we are not going to back down and we are going to keep fighting for climate justice.”

Climate change and bushfires
  • Does climate change cause bushfires?
    The link between rising greenhouse gas emissions and increased bushfire risk is complex but, according to major science agencies, clear. Climate change does not create bushfires, but it can and does make them worse. A number of factors contribute to bushfire risk, including temperature, fuel load, dryness, wind speed and humidity.
  • What is the evidence on rising temperatures?
    The Bureau of Meteorology and the CSIRO say Australia has warmed by 1C since 1910 and temperatures will increase in the future. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change says it is extremely likely increased atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases since the mid-20th century is the main reason it is getting hotter. The Bushfire and Natural Hazards research centre says the variability of normal events sits on top of that. Warmer weather increases the number of days each year on which there is high or extreme bushfire risk.
  • What other effects do carbon emissions have?
    Dry fuel load - the amount of forest and scrub available to burn - has been linked to rising emissions. Under the right conditions, carbon dioxide acts as a kind of fertiliser that increases plant growth.
  • So is climate change making everything dryer?
    Dryness is more complicated. Complex computer models have not found a consistent climate change signal linked to rising CO2 in the decline in rain that has produced the current eastern Australian drought. But higher temperatures accelerate evaporation. They also extend the growing season for vegetation in many regions, leading to greater transpiration (the process by which water is drawn from the soil and evaporated from plant leaves and flowers). The result is that soils, vegetation and the air may be drier than they would have been with the same amount of rainfall in the past.
  • What do recent weather patterns show?
    The year coming into the 2019-20 summer has been unusually warm and dry for large parts of Australia. Above average temperatures now occur most years and 2019 has been the fifth driest start to the year on record, and the driest since 1970.
Links

18/09/2019

An Ill Wind Fans The Flames

Sydney Morning Herald - Peter Hannam

Mark Graham has had a harrowing week with friends and neighbours battling a bushfire that destroyed his cabin and scorched deep into the nearby rainforests of north-eastern NSW.
"This is a Gondwana refugia - these areas have been permanently wet for tens of millions of years and have never burnt," the ecologist said, pausing to take a phone call while working on a seven kilometre-long firebreak near the World Heritage-listed Mt Hyland reserve. "Big swathes are burning right now."
A fire burning in normally damp rainforest near the World-Heritage listed Mt Hyland nature reserve. Credit: Mark Graham
While fire agencies from Queensland and NSW prepare to boost efforts to protect life and property as fire dangers mount again this weekend, Graham and his team of volunteers have no choice but to take up the task of stopping flames where they can.
"These type of trees have no tolerance," Graham said, reeling off tropical species around him such as ancient yellow carabeens, rosewoods and couchtrees. "If the fire comes in, they die."
A soaring yellow Carabeen tree, perhaps a 1000 years old, reaching into a cloud of bushfire smoke near Mt Hyland. Credit: Mark Graham
About an hour away near Dorrigo , Becky Gibson was preparing to host visitors to the camping ground she and her 89 year-old husband continue to run. A week of howling winds and "a lot of smoke", though, have them anxious about the summer to come.
"Normally it's quite damp but it's very tinder dry right now," Gibson says, noting rain gauges had collected just a quarter of typical yearly rain of about 2000 millimetres. "I've never seen anything like this," she says of her four decades in the area.

'Significant overture'
A wide arc of eastern Australia is primed for a busier than usual fire season. Large areas of NSW and Queensland are in the midst of a record drought and the Bureau of Meteorology forecasts pointing to below-average rainfall and warmer-than-normal temperatures for the rest of 2019 for most of the nation.
Ross Bradstock, Director of the University of Wollongong's Centre for Environmental Risk Management of Bushfires, said fire danger ratings will likely mount ahead of the passage of each cold front. Those bursts of hot, dry and gusty winds can be expected to gradually shift southwards to Sydney and beyond.
"We've got the ultra-dry fuels now, and inexorably you’ll get ignitions," Bradstock says. "We’ve had an overture and a pretty significant one. I think people down here better start getting their act together right now."
A bushfire burns near Tenterfield in northern NSW. Credit: AAP
For Peter Petty, mayor of Tenterfield, the overture has been an extended one. His town in northern NSW has among the tightest water restrictions - at level 4.5 - in the country, and it has had fires burning near its fringes for the past week.
Residents from nearby areas have been evacuated to the showgrounds, which along with other public gardens in this town of 3500, is gradually turning into a dustbowl.
"There's still lots of smoke around," Petty says, adding fire authorities "continue to be outstanding". Tankers had to spray treated sewage water to spare other supplies.
The threat is here "every day", he says. "We're a long way out from being out of the woods."

'Like mid-summer'
Among the lead agencies gearing up for long fire season is the NSW Rural Fire Service, a body that boasts an annual budget of $385.8 million and counts 72,491 volunteers.
While records show fires this early in the spring have afflicted the Sunshine Coast and other parts of southern Queensland and northern NSW before, the scale has set early challenges. In NSW, for instance, fires scorched some 130,000 hectares, and the three biggest blazes had a fire perimeter of 580 kilometres at the peak.
"There's no record of fire dangers that high that early in those areas in NSW," Rob Rogers, the RFS's deputy commissioner, says. "The fires were burning like it was mid-summer."
Across the state, the "only bright spot" is around Tumut in the Snowy Mountains but mostly because conditions are not as aberrantly dry as elsewhere.
According to the Bureau of Meteorology, rainfall over much of the fire-hit regions has been the lowest on record for the 20 months starting January 2018, and the 32 months starting January 2017. Similarly, the northern Murray-Darling Basin is tracking record low rainfall totals for those two periods.
Rainfall deficiencies over the past 17 months
April 1, 2018 - August 31, 2019 

Source: Bureau of Meteorology
During a recent visit to the Pilliga state forest in northern NSW, her team saw highly stressed trees that had shed their entire canopy and had started to resprout as if they had been burnt. Even some of the regrowth was starting to die.Few people are watching how vegetation is drying out more closely than Rachael Nolan, a researcher for the Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment.
"When that happens, things are pretty bad," Nolan said. "Some were quite serious."
Scribbly gum trees in the Pilliga Forest in north-western NSW look like they are re-sprouting after a fire - but there hasn't been one in that area. Credit: Rachael Nolan
Her main work, though, has been to develop fuel moisture maps using satellites that provide up-to-date data for scientists and fire authorities.
Moisture levels in dead trees and other vegetation can change overnight following a shower but changes in living plants "provide a very good indication of what will happen next week and the week after that".
For the region around Sydney, the indicators point to a rapid drying off, particularly in the Blue Mountains and to the city's north-west.
Mean live fuel moisture content in Sydney region
August 21 - September 5

Source: R.H.Nolan, M.M. Boer and R.A. Bradstock
Nolan stresses having dry fuel "is no guarantee that we will get fires", noting conditions were similarly dry this time a year ago but handy spring rains eased the threat.That said, the rate the vegetation has been curing is greater this year than in 2013, the last year when large fires burnt near Sydney particularly in the Blue Mountains.
Median live fuel moisture content, Sydney Basin
Source: R.H.Nolan, M.M. Boer and R.A. Bradstock
Upward trend in fire risks
Along with the abnormally dry conditions, temperatures in the fire-hit regions were unusual. Maximum readings on September 5 and 6 were about 10 degrees warmer than average, the Bureau says.
What is becoming more typical, though, is the rate at which heat records continue to tumble. Nationwide, for instance, daytime temperatures are tracking the warmest record for the first eight months of 2019 and last summer was Australia's hottest.
Since temperatures are a key component of dangerous fire weather - along with fuel, wind and humidity - it is not surprising climate change is nudging Australia's fire risks higher.
The latest BoM-CSIRO State of the Climate report shows southern and eastern regions have had some of the biggest increases in the fire danger indices in recent decades.
How fire danger risks are rising in Australia
Source: Bureau of Meteorology, CSIRO
Hamish Clarke, a fire researcher at the University of Wollongong and Western Sydney University, said that inter-year variability shows annual fluctuations in fire risks can be "quite considerable" but the trend is clearly upwards.
“Across the country, at a number of high-quality long-term weather stations, there had either been an increase, or no change," Clarke says. "We didn’t find a significant decrease anywhere.”
Climate modelling by Clarke on NSW and ACT and other researchers show the trajectory for temperatures is also upward while the impacts on other fire weather variables such as vegetation or wind speeds are less clear.
“Generally speaking the increases [of fire threats] are much more than the decreases and the areas much more, but some models show some decrease.
“It’s not much comfort because there are more models that are projecting quite large changes in both average and extreme conditions, with spring particularly highlighted,” he said.
Fires erupted in dozens of locations at the end of last week, including near Lithgow in the Blue Mountains. Credit: Nine News
Andrew Dowdy, a senior bureau climate researcher at the bureau, concurs.
"The projections show a clear trend towards more dangerous near-surface fire weather conditions for Australia" based on the McArthur Forest Fire Danger Index, Dowdy states in a recently published report in a Nature journal.

What can be done?
Bradstock says the question of whether human-induced climate change is worsening the fire threat in Australia is "old hat".
“The research has all been done. We don’t need to keep doing it," he says. "The big research challenge is how we’re going to adapt, and build resilient communities, and how will our ecosystems cope with the double combination of fire and drought.”
The Boeing 737, dubbed 'Gaia', in action for the NSW Rural Fire Service. Credit: NSW RFS, via Facebook
Adaptation is taking many forms, including additional "toys" such as NSW's newly bought 737 Large Air Tanker, with its 15,142-litre payload to drop on blazes.
Retardant-carrying drones may also feature but only when costs fall much further, Rogers says.
Instead, residents are more likely to tap into information technology advances that will help them understand the evolving threats near them.
It is only a matter of time before people in bushfire-prone areas will be able to be alerted to changes in fire weather, fuel loads and potential fire behavior.
Already being rolled out in different states is the University of Tasmania-developed AirRater app for smart phones that can provide real-time air quality readings including smoke.
A fire in a dried-out peat swamp near Port Macquarie, for instance has been choking residents for weeks. The new app, complete with sensors, was rolled out within weeks.

Insurance prod
Concern about smoke from hazard-reduction fires is one reason fire authorities sometimes have to curb their burning near large population centres such as Sydney or Melbourne.
A bushfire near Springwood in the Blue Mountains in October 2013. Credit: Dallas Kilponen
Insurance companies, though, monitor closely the work being done, and receive at least annual snapshots of how close vegetation is to properties in fire-prone areas.
Damage claims from bushfires are not yet "loss leaders" for the industry compared with cyclones, floods and storms, Karl Sullivan, head of risk operations for the Insurance Council of Australia, says.
Still, the Council has already declared the early season fires catastrophes, with $13.5 million in loss claims from 120 properties, with the toll expected to mount.
Since the 2009 bushfires, authorities have imposed tighter building codes requiring more fire-resistant materials and design that can cut premiums by about 10 per cent.
“These properties are by no means fire-proof...but they’re definitely more fire resilient, and that’s typically reflected in fire premiums," Sullivan says.
Mark Leplastrier, executive manager for natural perils at IAG, says bushfires were increasingly occurring outside the traditional fire season and in some areas of Victoria, for instance, were a greater risk for insurers than floods.
Fire damage risks were likely to continue to rise - but so were other climate-change perils that were poorly integrated into risk assessments, he says. For instance, houses might be better designed for wind stress in cyclone regions but they may still be hammered by water ingress caused by the higher storm surges.

Avoiding 'ecosystem collapse'
Justin Leonard, research leader for CSIRO's bushfire adaptation unit, said national building codes revised after Victoria's 2009 Black Saturday bushfires still had "significant flaws".
The focus of the new AS3959 code paid too little attention to ensuring builders avoid combustible materials in the roof, walls and below the floor, he said. A better alternative was the NASH steel-frame standard.
For instance, the revised code allowed flammable wooden decks. Residents might also do the right thing and place distance between their house and other structures on their property but still be just 1.8 metres of a neighbour's home.
"There's no special building consideration for that impact," he says.
For Bradstock, the evidence from western US is that Australian cities may be setting themselves up for big fire losses in the future.
"We’re building these very large houses...with very little spaces between houses," he says.
"If you get a fast-moving grass fire, and if it gets into them, there’s the possibility of very extensive spread," he says. "The evidence suggests you’re setting yourselves up for a problem.”
Bradstock said there had been “really no concerted effort to understand the resilience of our human systems to the multiple challenges of drought and fire", and those knowledge gaps could prove costly to communities.
Queensland bushfires: the surprise was how close they came to populated parts of the state. Credit: Cameron Neville, via QFES
Likewise the burning of previously wet wilderness areas of Tasmania and now along the eastern coast in the past week were a reminder that the natural environment may also be reaching thresholds."We just assume that these things are resilient,"he says. "They may not be.”
Up at Billy's Creek near Mt Hyland, Mark Graham was preparing to take a break after a week of battling fires that have charred as much as 100,000 hectares.
"We're trying to save the most ancient of the ancients," he says, adding society still has time to confront the threat of a warming climate before it is too late.
"There's still a chance to avoid having these ecosystems collapse around us."

Links

Lethal Heating is a citizens' initiative